Comparison Overview

McNaul Ebel Nawrot & Helgren PLLC

VS

Tahota Law Firm

McNaul Ebel Nawrot & Helgren PLLC

600 University Street, Seattle, WA, 98101, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

We, the lawyers at McNaul Ebel, have earned our reputation as passionate, knowledgeable advocates. Since 1995, we’ve pursued success vigorously for our clients across a broad range of litigation and transactional matters. Our clients include well-established national brands and small local firms, global enterprises and individual entrepreneurs, successful video game studios and software startups. Regardless of their goals, our clients know they have a trusted partner in McNaul Ebel.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tahota Law Firm

No.199, Tianfu Avenue (M), High-Tech District,, Chengdu, 610041, CN
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Established in 2000, TAHOTA has grown up to be one of the biggest and most famous law firms in China. Started from Chengdu, It now owns practice offices in Washington D.C. , Sydney, Kathmandu, Hong Kong(China), and 16 other mainland cities including Beijing, Chongqing, Shenzhen, Shanghai, Tianjin, Xi'an, Taiyuan, Xining, Lhasa, Urumqi,Nanjing, Wuhan, Kunming, Guiyang, Jinan and Haikou with more than 510 partners and more than 1700 attorneys. The legal service provided by TAHOTA is targeted on both Chinese and foreign enterprises, practice areas ranging from International investment and trade, Intellectual Property, Corporate and M&A, Finance, Real estate, Construction, Environment to Tax.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 345
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcnaul-ebel-nawrot-&-helgren-pllc.jpeg
McNaul Ebel Nawrot & Helgren PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tahota-law-firm.jpeg
Tahota Law Firm
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
McNaul Ebel Nawrot & Helgren PLLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tahota Law Firm
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McNaul Ebel Nawrot & Helgren PLLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tahota Law Firm in 2025.

Incident History — McNaul Ebel Nawrot & Helgren PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McNaul Ebel Nawrot & Helgren PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tahota Law Firm (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tahota Law Firm cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcnaul-ebel-nawrot-&-helgren-pllc.jpeg
McNaul Ebel Nawrot & Helgren PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tahota-law-firm.jpeg
Tahota Law Firm
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tahota Law Firm company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to McNaul Ebel Nawrot & Helgren PLLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tahota Law Firm company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to McNaul Ebel Nawrot & Helgren PLLC company.

In the current year, Tahota Law Firm company and McNaul Ebel Nawrot & Helgren PLLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tahota Law Firm company nor McNaul Ebel Nawrot & Helgren PLLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tahota Law Firm company nor McNaul Ebel Nawrot & Helgren PLLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tahota Law Firm company nor McNaul Ebel Nawrot & Helgren PLLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither McNaul Ebel Nawrot & Helgren PLLC company nor Tahota Law Firm company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither McNaul Ebel Nawrot & Helgren PLLC nor Tahota Law Firm holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither McNaul Ebel Nawrot & Helgren PLLC company nor Tahota Law Firm company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tahota Law Firm company employs more people globally than McNaul Ebel Nawrot & Helgren PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither McNaul Ebel Nawrot & Helgren PLLC nor Tahota Law Firm holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither McNaul Ebel Nawrot & Helgren PLLC nor Tahota Law Firm holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither McNaul Ebel Nawrot & Helgren PLLC nor Tahota Law Firm holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither McNaul Ebel Nawrot & Helgren PLLC nor Tahota Law Firm holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither McNaul Ebel Nawrot & Helgren PLLC nor Tahota Law Firm holds HIPAA certification.

Neither McNaul Ebel Nawrot & Helgren PLLC nor Tahota Law Firm holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X