Comparison Overview

McNamee Lochner P.C.

VS

QL Partners

McNamee Lochner P.C.

677 Broadway, Albany, NY, 12207, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

McNamee Lochner, P.C. is full-service law firm with offices in Albany and Saratoga Counties. Our firm serves individuals, families, and businesses across New York State in most areas of law. Our reputation has been built on providing the highest level of legal representation for our clients in and out of the courtroom. Ranked as a “Best Law Firm” by U.S. News and World Report, our attorneys are widely recognized among the best in their respective fields by independent third parties such as Martindale-Hubbell, Super Lawyers®, and Best Lawyers in America®, and many have achieved prestigious positions in industry, the legal community, and public service. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

QL Partners

1329, 13th Cross Road, Eshwara Layout, Indira Nagar, Bangalore, Karnataka, IN, 560038
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

QL Partners (formerly Quasar Legal) is a general practice firm established with the intent to offer innovative, focused, practical, and competent legal and regulatory advice and assistance to start-ups, entrepreneurs, mid-sized companies, business ventures, funds, financers, incubation centers, and individuals. The Firm was founded in the year 2010, by S.A. Karthik, who brings in over 25 years of experience, having represented clients in various matters such as venture capital, technology contracts, advice to start-ups, and general commercial law & compliance. The Firm holds expertise in the areas of Corporate & Commercial Law, Company Law, Technology, Media & Telecommunication Law, Data Privacy Law, Fintech Law, Employment Law, Intellectual Property Law, Sports Law, Private Client practice, Real Estate, Testamentary & Succession, and Litigation. The Firm's compass is always oriented to a business-friendly approach while giving legal advice. The Firm comprises of an enthusiastic and well-spirited team that caters to the client’s requirements and concerns and offers knowledge-based, up-to-date, strategic and result-oriented solutions and support to safeguard the client’s interests at every step and stage. The Firm is headquartered in Bangalore and offers legal assistance and support to clients across the globe.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcnamee-lochner-titus-&-williams-p.c..jpeg
McNamee Lochner P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/qlpartners.jpeg
QL Partners
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
McNamee Lochner P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
QL Partners
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McNamee Lochner P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for QL Partners in 2025.

Incident History — McNamee Lochner P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McNamee Lochner P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — QL Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

QL Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcnamee-lochner-titus-&-williams-p.c..jpeg
McNamee Lochner P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/qlpartners.jpeg
QL Partners
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

McNamee Lochner P.C. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to QL Partners company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, QL Partners company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to McNamee Lochner P.C. company.

In the current year, QL Partners company and McNamee Lochner P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither QL Partners company nor McNamee Lochner P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither QL Partners company nor McNamee Lochner P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither QL Partners company nor McNamee Lochner P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither McNamee Lochner P.C. company nor QL Partners company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither McNamee Lochner P.C. nor QL Partners holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither McNamee Lochner P.C. company nor QL Partners company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

QL Partners company employs more people globally than McNamee Lochner P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither McNamee Lochner P.C. nor QL Partners holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither McNamee Lochner P.C. nor QL Partners holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither McNamee Lochner P.C. nor QL Partners holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither McNamee Lochner P.C. nor QL Partners holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither McNamee Lochner P.C. nor QL Partners holds HIPAA certification.

Neither McNamee Lochner P.C. nor QL Partners holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X