Comparison Overview

McNamee Lochner P.C.

VS

CMM Quay Legal Group

McNamee Lochner P.C.

677 Broadway, Albany, NY, 12207, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

McNamee Lochner, P.C. is full-service law firm with offices in Albany and Saratoga Counties. Our firm serves individuals, families, and businesses across New York State in most areas of law. Our reputation has been built on providing the highest level of legal representation for our clients in and out of the courtroom. Ranked as a “Best Law Firm” by U.S. News and World Report, our attorneys are widely recognized among the best in their respective fields by independent third parties such as Martindale-Hubbell, Super Lawyers®, and Best Lawyers in America®, and many have achieved prestigious positions in industry, the legal community, and public service. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CMM Quay Legal Group

23 O'Connell St, SYDNEY, NSW, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Our experienced lawyers and support staff are dedicated to fully understanding your needs and focusing on what is important to you. With a wealth of combined industry experience spanning more than 120 years, our expert lawyers provide forward-thinking solutions delivered with integrity and sensitivity. We treat our clients equally, big or small. We make it our job to understand their challenges, minimise risks and offer effective legal solutions. We believe in empowering our clients with knowledge and guidance. Contact us today to make an appointment with one of our expert lawyers or visit us at our conveniently located office in the heart of Sydney’s CBD.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcnamee-lochner-titus-&-williams-p.c..jpeg
McNamee Lochner P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
McNamee Lochner P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CMM Quay Legal Group
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McNamee Lochner P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CMM Quay Legal Group in 2025.

Incident History — McNamee Lochner P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McNamee Lochner P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CMM Quay Legal Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CMM Quay Legal Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcnamee-lochner-titus-&-williams-p.c..jpeg
McNamee Lochner P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cmm-quay-legal-group.jpeg
CMM Quay Legal Group
Incidents

FAQ

Both McNamee Lochner P.C. company and CMM Quay Legal Group company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, CMM Quay Legal Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to McNamee Lochner P.C. company.

In the current year, CMM Quay Legal Group company and McNamee Lochner P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CMM Quay Legal Group company nor McNamee Lochner P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CMM Quay Legal Group company nor McNamee Lochner P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CMM Quay Legal Group company nor McNamee Lochner P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither McNamee Lochner P.C. company nor CMM Quay Legal Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither McNamee Lochner P.C. nor CMM Quay Legal Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither McNamee Lochner P.C. company nor CMM Quay Legal Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

McNamee Lochner P.C. company employs more people globally than CMM Quay Legal Group company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither McNamee Lochner P.C. nor CMM Quay Legal Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither McNamee Lochner P.C. nor CMM Quay Legal Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither McNamee Lochner P.C. nor CMM Quay Legal Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither McNamee Lochner P.C. nor CMM Quay Legal Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither McNamee Lochner P.C. nor CMM Quay Legal Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither McNamee Lochner P.C. nor CMM Quay Legal Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X