Comparison Overview

Metropolitan Center for Mental Health

VS

Felix Foundation

Metropolitan Center for Mental Health

8 W 86th St, New York, 10024, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://http://www.metropolitancenter.com

Metropolitan Center for Mental Health (MCMH) is a non-profit, outpatient behavioral health organization founded in 1962, dedicated to providing affordable psychological and psychiatric treatment to support the emotional wellbeing of people living in its surrounding community. Our mission to serve all members of our community regardless of financial or cultural barriers remains core to our service delivery today. For over 50 years, our work has been driven by our commitment to three goals: 1. Offer a broad range of mental health and addiction services to individuals and families across the lifespan 2. Provide timely access to high quality, evidence-based treatment modalities 3. Deliver culturally competent and linguistically diverse services to meet the unique needs of the communities we serve

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 132
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Felix Foundation

13901 S. Lydia Ave, Robbins, IL, 60053, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
https://www.felixfoundation.org

FELIX Foundation is dedicated to your recovery and wellness. Our clients come to us in need of mental health services, housing and support. FELIX programs allow clients a fresh start in their recovery, safe housing and supportive services. FELIX FOUNDATION IS A 501(C)(3) NOT-FOR-PROFIT ORGANIZATION PROVIDING COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES AND HOUSING FOR ADULTS WITH MENTAL ILLNESS IN COOK COUNTY, IL.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcmhnyc.jpeg
Metropolitan Center for Mental Health
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/felix-foundation.jpeg
Felix Foundation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Metropolitan Center for Mental Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Felix Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metropolitan Center for Mental Health in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Felix Foundation in 2026.

Incident History — Metropolitan Center for Mental Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metropolitan Center for Mental Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Felix Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Felix Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcmhnyc.jpeg
Metropolitan Center for Mental Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/felix-foundation.jpeg
Felix Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Felix Foundation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Metropolitan Center for Mental Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Felix Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Metropolitan Center for Mental Health company.

In the current year, Felix Foundation company and Metropolitan Center for Mental Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Felix Foundation company nor Metropolitan Center for Mental Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Felix Foundation company nor Metropolitan Center for Mental Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Felix Foundation company nor Metropolitan Center for Mental Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Metropolitan Center for Mental Health company nor Felix Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Metropolitan Center for Mental Health nor Felix Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Metropolitan Center for Mental Health company nor Felix Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Metropolitan Center for Mental Health company employs more people globally than Felix Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Metropolitan Center for Mental Health nor Felix Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Metropolitan Center for Mental Health nor Felix Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Metropolitan Center for Mental Health nor Felix Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Metropolitan Center for Mental Health nor Felix Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Metropolitan Center for Mental Health nor Felix Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Metropolitan Center for Mental Health nor Felix Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References