Comparison Overview

McLean Hospital

VS

Chestnut Hill Counseling Associates

McLean Hospital

115 Mill St., Belmont, MA, 02478, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

At the heart of McLean Hospital, a member of Mass General Brigham, is a mission to help those impacted by mental health through treatment, research, and public and professional education. In treating conditions such as depression, anxiety, and addiction, our entire organization is dedicated to improving the lives of patients and their families with innovative treatments based on the latest research. Our staff, faculty, students, volunteers, and supporters are helping create the future of mental health research, diagnosis, and treatment based around collaboration and individual care plans that empower patients beyond their treatment. As a major teaching facility of Harvard Medical School, McLean maintains the largest research program of any private psychiatric hospital in the United States.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 2,301
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Chestnut Hill Counseling Associates

16 Fifth Street, Dover, New Hampshire, 03820, US
Last Update: 2025-11-29

When you know you need help but don’t know what to do, the caring therapists at Chestnut Hill Counseling Associates are here to embrace your struggle with you. For that time in your life when you need help, Chestnut Hill Counseling Associates are here. We try to be strong, no matter what we face: divorce, violence, pain, addiction. Yet, we do not give ourselves the chance to accept that we are human and that sometimes we tend to run and hide from our problems. Without facing our problems head-on, they will only consume our lives and the lives of those around us.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mclean-hospital.jpeg
McLean Hospital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chestnut-hill-counseling-associates.jpeg
Chestnut Hill Counseling Associates
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
McLean Hospital
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chestnut Hill Counseling Associates
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McLean Hospital in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chestnut Hill Counseling Associates in 2026.

Incident History — McLean Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McLean Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chestnut Hill Counseling Associates (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chestnut Hill Counseling Associates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mclean-hospital.jpeg
McLean Hospital
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chestnut-hill-counseling-associates.jpeg
Chestnut Hill Counseling Associates
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

McLean Hospital company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Chestnut Hill Counseling Associates company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Chestnut Hill Counseling Associates company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to McLean Hospital company.

In the current year, Chestnut Hill Counseling Associates company and McLean Hospital company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Chestnut Hill Counseling Associates company nor McLean Hospital company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Chestnut Hill Counseling Associates company nor McLean Hospital company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Chestnut Hill Counseling Associates company nor McLean Hospital company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither McLean Hospital company nor Chestnut Hill Counseling Associates company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither McLean Hospital nor Chestnut Hill Counseling Associates holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither McLean Hospital company nor Chestnut Hill Counseling Associates company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

McLean Hospital company employs more people globally than Chestnut Hill Counseling Associates company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither McLean Hospital nor Chestnut Hill Counseling Associates holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither McLean Hospital nor Chestnut Hill Counseling Associates holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither McLean Hospital nor Chestnut Hill Counseling Associates holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither McLean Hospital nor Chestnut Hill Counseling Associates holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither McLean Hospital nor Chestnut Hill Counseling Associates holds HIPAA certification.

Neither McLean Hospital nor Chestnut Hill Counseling Associates holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N