Comparison Overview

McLays & MiPost

VS

Landmark Visibility Solutions

McLays & MiPost

Forest Farm, Longwood Drive, Cardiff, South Glamorgan, GB, CF14 7ZB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

McLays is a market leader in print, mail and digital communications. With more than 200 years of history behind us and a culture of continuous innovation and investment, we are a trusted and reliable partner to some of the biggest and best-known brands in the UK. We provide a diverse range of quality services to a wide variety of blue-chip clients across sectors including financial services, education, pharmaceutical, government, utilities, manufacturing and retail. With environmental ISO standards and FSC accreditation, we offer greener solutions to clients who care about their carbon footprint and want to meet their corporate and social responsibility goals. Our data security ISO certifications demonstrate how seriously we take our clients' security.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Landmark Visibility Solutions

2618 N. Windsor Dr, Arlington Heights, 60004, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12

We make signs, but we are not just another sign shop. Landmark can assist your company in finding comprehensive solutions for growth and market specific visibility through various channels including, but not limited to signage, banners, trade-show displays, and vehicle graphics. Our experienced graphics team utilizes tried and true methods of expanding brand awareness, as well as creating a level of professionalism to attract potential customers. Our innovative team will help you energize your customer base, and put you on the map.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mclays.jpeg
McLays & MiPost
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/landmark-visibility-solutions.jpeg
Landmark Visibility Solutions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
McLays & MiPost
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Landmark Visibility Solutions
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McLays & MiPost in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Landmark Visibility Solutions in 2025.

Incident History — McLays & MiPost (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McLays & MiPost cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Landmark Visibility Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Landmark Visibility Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mclays.jpeg
McLays & MiPost
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/landmark-visibility-solutions.jpeg
Landmark Visibility Solutions
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both McLays & MiPost company and Landmark Visibility Solutions company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Landmark Visibility Solutions company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to McLays & MiPost company.

In the current year, Landmark Visibility Solutions company and McLays & MiPost company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Landmark Visibility Solutions company nor McLays & MiPost company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Landmark Visibility Solutions company nor McLays & MiPost company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Landmark Visibility Solutions company nor McLays & MiPost company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither McLays & MiPost company nor Landmark Visibility Solutions company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither McLays & MiPost nor Landmark Visibility Solutions holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither McLays & MiPost company nor Landmark Visibility Solutions company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

McLays & MiPost company employs more people globally than Landmark Visibility Solutions company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither McLays & MiPost nor Landmark Visibility Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither McLays & MiPost nor Landmark Visibility Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither McLays & MiPost nor Landmark Visibility Solutions holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither McLays & MiPost nor Landmark Visibility Solutions holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither McLays & MiPost nor Landmark Visibility Solutions holds HIPAA certification.

Neither McLays & MiPost nor Landmark Visibility Solutions holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L