Comparison Overview

McLane Middleton

VS

H3 Counsel LLC

McLane Middleton

900 Elm Street, None, Manchester, NH, US, 03101
Last Update: 2025-11-30
Between 700 and 749

Founded in New Hampshire in 1919, McLane Middleton has grown to be the largest and most diverse law firm in the state. In 2008, we expanded into Massachusetts to accommodate our clients'​ growing legal needs throughout New England. With 100 attorneys and more than 25 legal assistants, our progressive approach has enabled us to work with all types of clients in New England and beyond to deliver solutions that are customized and cost-effective. Our firm's organization, hiring practices, training, and use of technology provide us with the ability and capacity to provide the highest level of expertise in very specific areas of law. The most recent edition of The Best Lawyers in America® recognizes 57 of our attorneys. McLane Middleton is also recognized as one of America's leading law firms in Chambers USA: America's Leading Business Lawyers. McLane Middleton carries the highest legal ability rating in Martindale-Hubbell, with a number of our lawyers also individually recognized through that rating system.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 369
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

H3 Counsel LLC

None
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

We are a legal recruiting firm specializing primarily in lateral attorney placements at the associate, partner, and counsel level, both nationally and internationally. As a company whose founder, JP Helder, is a former AmLaw 100 equity hiring partner and litigator, we provide a broad perspective and ability rarely found in the recruiting industry. JP is intricately involved in every aspect of the daily goings on at H3 Counsel--from resume review, to interview prep, to final negotiations for securing the best opportunity for you. We believe this value added is specific to H3 Counsel, and may provide the added benefit to your successful transition. To schedule a call with JP, please email me at [email protected]. It would be our pleasure to assist you as you evaluate your career and future.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mclane-middleton.jpeg
McLane Middleton
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/h3-counsel-llc.jpeg
H3 Counsel LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
McLane Middleton
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
H3 Counsel LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McLane Middleton in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for H3 Counsel LLC in 2025.

Incident History — McLane Middleton (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McLane Middleton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — H3 Counsel LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

H3 Counsel LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mclane-middleton.jpeg
McLane Middleton
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2020
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/h3-counsel-llc.jpeg
H3 Counsel LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

H3 Counsel LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to McLane Middleton company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

McLane Middleton company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas H3 Counsel LLC company has not reported any.

In the current year, H3 Counsel LLC company and McLane Middleton company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither H3 Counsel LLC company nor McLane Middleton company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

McLane Middleton company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other H3 Counsel LLC company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither H3 Counsel LLC company nor McLane Middleton company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither McLane Middleton company nor H3 Counsel LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither McLane Middleton nor H3 Counsel LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither McLane Middleton company nor H3 Counsel LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

McLane Middleton company employs more people globally than H3 Counsel LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither McLane Middleton nor H3 Counsel LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither McLane Middleton nor H3 Counsel LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither McLane Middleton nor H3 Counsel LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither McLane Middleton nor H3 Counsel LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither McLane Middleton nor H3 Counsel LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither McLane Middleton nor H3 Counsel LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X