Comparison Overview

McKesson

VS

Owens & Minor

McKesson

6555 State Highway 161, Irving, Texas, 75039, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Welcome to the official LinkedIn page for McKesson Corporation. We're an impact-driven healthcare organization dedicated to “Advancing Health Outcomes For All.” As a global healthcare company, we touch virtually every aspect of health. Our leaders empower our people to lead with a growth mindset and deliver excellence for our customers, partners, and the wellbeing of people, everywhere. We work with biopharma companies, care providers, pharmacies, manufacturers, governments, and others to deliver insights, products and services that make quality care more accessible and affordable. Delivering better health outcomes for our employees, our communities, and our environment. Every day, we strive to inspire and enable people to reach their full potential. To learn more about how #TeamMckesson helps improve care in every setting, visit: https://bit.ly/3xadvB0

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 22,564
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Owens & Minor

10900 Nuckols Rd, Suite 400, Glen Allen, Virginia, US, 23060
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Owens & Minor, Inc. (NYSE: OMI) is a Fortune 500 global healthcare solutions company providing essential products and services that support care from the hospital to the home. For over 100 years, Owens & Minor and its affiliated brands, Apria® , Byram®, and HALYARD*, have helped to make each day better for the patients, providers, and communities we serve. Powered by more than 20,000 teammates worldwide, Owens & Minor delivers comfort and confidence behind the scenes so healthcare stays at the forefront. Owens & Minor exists because every day, everywhere, Life Takes Care™.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 12,925
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mckesson.jpeg
McKesson
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/owens-minor.jpeg
Owens & Minor
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
McKesson
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Owens & Minor
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McKesson in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Owens & Minor in 2025.

Incident History — McKesson (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McKesson cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Owens & Minor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Owens & Minor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mckesson.jpeg
McKesson
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/owens-minor.jpeg
Owens & Minor
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

McKesson company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Owens & Minor company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Owens & Minor company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas McKesson company has not reported any.

In the current year, Owens & Minor company and McKesson company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Owens & Minor company nor McKesson company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Owens & Minor company has disclosed at least one data breach, while McKesson company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Owens & Minor company nor McKesson company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither McKesson company nor Owens & Minor company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither McKesson nor Owens & Minor holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

McKesson company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Owens & Minor company.

McKesson company employs more people globally than Owens & Minor company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither McKesson nor Owens & Minor holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither McKesson nor Owens & Minor holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither McKesson nor Owens & Minor holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither McKesson nor Owens & Minor holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither McKesson nor Owens & Minor holds HIPAA certification.

Neither McKesson nor Owens & Minor holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N