Comparison Overview

McKenna

VS

Iconotech

McKenna

2815 Falls Ave., Waterloo, Iowa, 50701, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://mckennapro.com/

Established in 1969, McKenna has been a leader in printing services dedicated to the photographic community for over five decades. Our roots are firmly planted in the heart of Iowa, but our services extend across all of the United States and internationally. Our commitment to excellence in products, service, and delivery has made us a trusted partner for professional photographers everywhere.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Iconotech

460 Woodland Ave, Bloomfield, 06002, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.iconotech.com

Iconotech was founded in 1992 by the new owners of a duplicator and mimeograph supplies company in Chicago. With previous experience in the early days of large character ink jet printing in Europe while working for a U.S. based packaging company, their vision was to grow a new business in the packaging market for case marking and coding. The relentless pursuit of a digital printing technology that is significantly more durable and less expensive than printing plates, ink jet, preprints and other printing methods resulted in the Iconotech systems that we have today.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mckenna-pro.jpeg
McKenna
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iconotech.jpeg
Iconotech
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
McKenna
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Iconotech
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McKenna in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Iconotech in 2025.

Incident History — McKenna (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McKenna cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Iconotech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Iconotech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mckenna-pro.jpeg
McKenna
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iconotech.jpeg
Iconotech
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both McKenna company and Iconotech company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Iconotech company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to McKenna company.

In the current year, Iconotech company and McKenna company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Iconotech company nor McKenna company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Iconotech company nor McKenna company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Iconotech company nor McKenna company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither McKenna company nor Iconotech company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither McKenna nor Iconotech holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither McKenna company nor Iconotech company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

McKenna company employs more people globally than Iconotech company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither McKenna nor Iconotech holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither McKenna nor Iconotech holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither McKenna nor Iconotech holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither McKenna nor Iconotech holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither McKenna nor Iconotech holds HIPAA certification.

Neither McKenna nor Iconotech holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References