Comparison Overview

McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC

VS

Gowling WLG Hamilton

McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC

801 Grand Avenue, Suite 3200, Des Moines, Iowa, 50309, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC is your worldwide intellectual property partner since 1924. We work with local, national, and international clients to secure, protect, and enforce their intellectual property rights. We strive to help creators and innovators understand and navigate the complexities of patent, trademark, copyright, licensing, and trade secret law to ensure that our clients are able to spend more time doing what they do best, innovating. The attorneys at MVS have broad practical experience and expertise in various engineering and life science fields that enable us to provide full service intellectual property representation across broad technological and creative areas, including the firm’s new entertainment law practice group. MVS has built its strong reputation by consistently and successfully advocating on behalf of clients at the highest level in federal and state courts across the country for nearly a century. Having worked with clients all over the United States and in over 160 countries worldwide, combined with strategic partnerships including LEGUS, an international network of law firms, MVS is your worldwide intellectual property partner.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 57
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gowling WLG Hamilton

Hamilton, L8P 4Z5, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Harnessing our broad industry expertise, far-reaching global platform, and forward-thinking partnerships with key local stakeholders, we, at Gowling WLG, connect Hamilton, ON to a world of opportunity. No other law firm wants to accelerate growth more than we do — and no other firm is as ambitious for its clients'​ success the way we are.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mckee-voorhees-&-sease-plc.jpeg
McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gowlingwlghamilton.jpeg
Gowling WLG Hamilton
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gowling WLG Hamilton
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gowling WLG Hamilton in 2025.

Incident History — McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gowling WLG Hamilton (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gowling WLG Hamilton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mckee-voorhees-&-sease-plc.jpeg
McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gowlingwlghamilton.jpeg
Gowling WLG Hamilton
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gowling WLG Hamilton company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gowling WLG Hamilton company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC company.

In the current year, Gowling WLG Hamilton company and McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gowling WLG Hamilton company nor McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gowling WLG Hamilton company nor McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gowling WLG Hamilton company nor McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC company nor Gowling WLG Hamilton company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC nor Gowling WLG Hamilton holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Gowling WLG Hamilton company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC company.

Neither McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC nor Gowling WLG Hamilton holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC nor Gowling WLG Hamilton holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC nor Gowling WLG Hamilton holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC nor Gowling WLG Hamilton holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC nor Gowling WLG Hamilton holds HIPAA certification.

Neither McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC nor Gowling WLG Hamilton holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X