Comparison Overview

McFarland PLLC

VS

Triumph Law, P.C.

McFarland PLLC

811 Louisiana St., Suite 2520, Houston, TX, 77002, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Trial lawyers focusing on eminent domain, condemnation, and valuation litigation. McFarland PLLC represents property owners in maximizing compensation when governmental or public-use entities attempt to take private property for public use. While our experience has included takings projects for highway expansion, pipelines, electric transmission lines, and flood control, our principal practice is focused on highway and roadway widening projects impacting retail, commercial, industrial, and special-use properties. Firm founder Charles McFarland has been selected by his peers for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America® in the practice area of Eminent Domain and Condemnation Law and Texas Super Lawyers for Eminent Domain. Charles additionally has the AV Preeminent Rating, Martindale-Hubbell's highest possible rating for both ethical standards and legal ability.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Triumph Law, P.C.

600 Coolidge Drive, Folsom, California, 95630, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Triumph Law, P.C. is a personal injury firm serving the Sacramento Region, ensuring injured accident victims receive the best legal representation and the highest possible financial compensation. Lead attorney Robert Carichoff has over 20 years of litigation experience. He and his team are committed to providing every client with personalized and compassionate legal service. Call us today for a free consultation (916) 500-0000

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcfarland-pllc.jpeg
McFarland PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carichoff-law-group-p-c.jpeg
Triumph Law, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
McFarland PLLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Triumph Law, P.C.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McFarland PLLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Triumph Law, P.C. in 2025.

Incident History — McFarland PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McFarland PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Triumph Law, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Triumph Law, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcfarland-pllc.jpeg
McFarland PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carichoff-law-group-p-c.jpeg
Triumph Law, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both McFarland PLLC company and Triumph Law, P.C. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Triumph Law, P.C. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to McFarland PLLC company.

In the current year, Triumph Law, P.C. company and McFarland PLLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Triumph Law, P.C. company nor McFarland PLLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Triumph Law, P.C. company nor McFarland PLLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Triumph Law, P.C. company nor McFarland PLLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither McFarland PLLC company nor Triumph Law, P.C. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither McFarland PLLC nor Triumph Law, P.C. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither McFarland PLLC company nor Triumph Law, P.C. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

McFarland PLLC company employs more people globally than Triumph Law, P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither McFarland PLLC nor Triumph Law, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither McFarland PLLC nor Triumph Law, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither McFarland PLLC nor Triumph Law, P.C. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither McFarland PLLC nor Triumph Law, P.C. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither McFarland PLLC nor Triumph Law, P.C. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither McFarland PLLC nor Triumph Law, P.C. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X