Comparison Overview

McLean Communications

VS

SinoVision English Channel

McLean Communications

150 Dow St, Manchester, 03101, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://ypi.com

New Hampshire's premier media and custom publishing company, McLean Communications, is home to New Hampshire Magazine, NH Business Review, Parenting NH, New Hampshire Magazine's Bride, New Hampshire Home and dozens of custom and annual publications and events. McLean Communications is a wholly-owned subsidary of Yankee Publishing in Dublin, NH. http://ypi.com McLean Communications embraces equality and diversity and will consider flexible approaches to working conditions where possible. The 35+ employees are based in Manchester, NH and receive comprehensive salaries and benefits including but not limited to Medical, Dental, Vision, Life / AD&D, FSA, HRA, 401K and a robust vacation and holiday package.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

SinoVision English Channel

15 East 40th Street, New York, 10016, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://en.sinovision.net

SinoVision English Channel is a subsidiary of SinoVision, Inc. SinoVision English Channel is a U.S. based media company that offers various independently-produced programs based on news, language, culture, education, and the cultivation of interest and awareness in Chinese culture. Founded in 1990, SinoVision, an affiliated member of the Asian Culture and Media Group, has been one of the largest and most influential Chinese media outlets in North America. With two 24-hour digital channels covering the Greater New York area - WMBC 63.4 (Chinese Channel) and WMBC 63.3 (English Channel), SinoVision Chinese Channel also covers New York City on Cable Channel 73. SinoVision's direct television coverage blankets a population of more than 30 million, while people all over the world can watch SinoVision shows on its website through tablets and mobile devices. SinoVision's headquarters are in midtown Manhattan, but to best serve its local communities, it has offices in downtown Manhattan, Flushing, Brooklyn, Washington D.C., Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Houston.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mceancommunications.jpeg
McLean Communications
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sinovision-english-channel.jpeg
SinoVision English Channel
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
McLean Communications
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SinoVision English Channel
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McLean Communications in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SinoVision English Channel in 2025.

Incident History — McLean Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McLean Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SinoVision English Channel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SinoVision English Channel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mceancommunications.jpeg
McLean Communications
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sinovision-english-channel.jpeg
SinoVision English Channel
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both McLean Communications company and SinoVision English Channel company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, SinoVision English Channel company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to McLean Communications company.

In the current year, SinoVision English Channel company and McLean Communications company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SinoVision English Channel company nor McLean Communications company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SinoVision English Channel company nor McLean Communications company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SinoVision English Channel company nor McLean Communications company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither McLean Communications company nor SinoVision English Channel company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither McLean Communications nor SinoVision English Channel holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither McLean Communications company nor SinoVision English Channel company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither McLean Communications nor SinoVision English Channel holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither McLean Communications nor SinoVision English Channel holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither McLean Communications nor SinoVision English Channel holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither McLean Communications nor SinoVision English Channel holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither McLean Communications nor SinoVision English Channel holds HIPAA certification.

Neither McLean Communications nor SinoVision English Channel holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References