Comparison Overview

McDavid

VS

Covey Sales & Marketing, LLC

McDavid

10305 Argonne Dr, None, Woodridge, Illinois, US, 60517
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 700 and 749

McDavid, Inc. designs and markets sports medicine and sports protection products, inaddition to performance apparel for active people and athletes. McDavid® products are at the top of the recommended lists of pro athletes, sports medicine professionals and athletic trainers. From research-backed ankle braces to protective apparel with HEX™ technology, McDavid® products address both the broad range and the specific needs of professional, collegiate and all athletes across a variety of sports. The company is headquartered in Chicago with subsidiaries in Japan and Europe.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 124
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Covey Sales & Marketing, LLC

undefined, undefined, undefined, 55346, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Covey Sales & Marketing is a group of independent manufacturer’s representatives dedicated to providing sales and marketing services for premium brands in the Shooting, Hunting and Outdoor industry. We provide a full range of services for our manufacturer clients to sporting goods retailers, wholesalers, and large format retailers in the Midwestern U.S. Our award winning sales representatives are seasoned industry veterans each with ten or more years of experience and strong account relationships in their respective territories.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcdavidusa.jpeg
McDavid
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/covey-sales-&-marketing-llc.jpeg
Covey Sales & Marketing, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
McDavid
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Covey Sales & Marketing, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McDavid in 2025.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Covey Sales & Marketing, LLC in 2025.

Incident History — McDavid (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McDavid cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Covey Sales & Marketing, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Covey Sales & Marketing, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcdavidusa.jpeg
McDavid
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Hidden code placed on webservers
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/covey-sales-&-marketing-llc.jpeg
Covey Sales & Marketing, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Covey Sales & Marketing, LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to McDavid company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

McDavid company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Covey Sales & Marketing, LLC company has not reported any.

In the current year, Covey Sales & Marketing, LLC company and McDavid company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Covey Sales & Marketing, LLC company nor McDavid company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

McDavid company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Covey Sales & Marketing, LLC company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Covey Sales & Marketing, LLC company nor McDavid company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither McDavid company nor Covey Sales & Marketing, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither McDavid nor Covey Sales & Marketing, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither McDavid company nor Covey Sales & Marketing, LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

McDavid company employs more people globally than Covey Sales & Marketing, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither McDavid nor Covey Sales & Marketing, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither McDavid nor Covey Sales & Marketing, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither McDavid nor Covey Sales & Marketing, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither McDavid nor Covey Sales & Marketing, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither McDavid nor Covey Sales & Marketing, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither McDavid nor Covey Sales & Marketing, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H