Comparison Overview

McCourt Label Company

VS

The Goodprinter

McCourt Label Company

20 Egbert Lane, Lewis Run, PA, 16738, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

McCourt Label Company, founded in 1896, has a high level of expertise in designing and manufacturing custom products for mission-critical labeling needs. Our labeling solutions consultants are ready to help you select the liner, face sheet, adhesive and design suitable for your application. With full in-house capabilities, we treat every order with special care, from advanced art room and plate-making processes through pressroom, finishing and shipping.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Goodprinter

3769 Dunlap Street North, Arden Hills, MN, 55112, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10

The Goodprinter is comprised of experts and educators whose aim is to help companies realize the potential power of communicating to their customers through printed communications. Our goal is to provide honest service that ensures your projects are completed with color and design accuracy. Our competent bindery is staffed with qualified individuals who care about how your project ends up. Whether it needs special cutting, folding, inserting or other finishing touches, the bindery staff will get it done right. Design, Print, Deliver.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mccourt-label-company.jpeg
McCourt Label Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-goodprinter.jpeg
The Goodprinter
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
McCourt Label Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Goodprinter
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McCourt Label Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Goodprinter in 2025.

Incident History — McCourt Label Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McCourt Label Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Goodprinter (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Goodprinter cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mccourt-label-company.jpeg
McCourt Label Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-goodprinter.jpeg
The Goodprinter
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Goodprinter company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to McCourt Label Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Goodprinter company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to McCourt Label Company company.

In the current year, The Goodprinter company and McCourt Label Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Goodprinter company nor McCourt Label Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Goodprinter company nor McCourt Label Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Goodprinter company nor McCourt Label Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither McCourt Label Company company nor The Goodprinter company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither McCourt Label Company nor The Goodprinter holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither McCourt Label Company company nor The Goodprinter company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

McCourt Label Company company employs more people globally than The Goodprinter company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither McCourt Label Company nor The Goodprinter holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither McCourt Label Company nor The Goodprinter holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither McCourt Label Company nor The Goodprinter holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither McCourt Label Company nor The Goodprinter holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither McCourt Label Company nor The Goodprinter holds HIPAA certification.

Neither McCourt Label Company nor The Goodprinter holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N