Comparison Overview

McConway & Torley, LLC

VS

Iron Horse Engineering Company

McConway & Torley, LLC

109 48th Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15201, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

With locations in Pittsburgh, PA and Kutztown, PA, McConway and Torley, LLC has been in continuous operations since 1869, the same year the first U.S. transcontinental railroad was completed. McConway has been able to meet the needs of our customers with a steady, dependable and economical supply of high quality coupler products. As the original designers of the first standard automatic coupler, continued innovation and craftsmanship have led to a product line that includes every ARR approved coupler as well as custom coupler solutions, which are all proudly cast in the U.S.

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 144
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Iron Horse Engineering Company

15567 Main Market Rd., Parkman, Ohio, 44080, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

At Iron Horse Engineering Co., our innovations stand the test of time. We started in 1987 with the invention of the rail boot and haven’t looked back. Today, our products and services span from transit to heavy haul freight lines covering over 1 million miles of track. From Inquiry to Installation, the combined efforts, technical knowledge and support services of the Iron Horse Engineering team allow us to create, modify and manufacture products and provide solutions for: Electrical Isolation Noise and Vibration Mitigation Freight Solutions Track Materials Rail seal, gauge support fixtures, railboot, rail pads, leveling ties, shims, gauge retention bars, composite crossties and many other products. All of our innovative products are MADE IN THE U.S.A. from the finest materials, guaranteed to hold up to the strictest specifications.

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcconway-&-torley-llc.jpeg
McConway & Torley, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iron-horse-engineering-company.jpeg
Iron Horse Engineering Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
McConway & Torley, LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Iron Horse Engineering Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McConway & Torley, LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Iron Horse Engineering Company in 2025.

Incident History — McConway & Torley, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McConway & Torley, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Iron Horse Engineering Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Iron Horse Engineering Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcconway-&-torley-llc.jpeg
McConway & Torley, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iron-horse-engineering-company.jpeg
Iron Horse Engineering Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

McConway & Torley, LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Iron Horse Engineering Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Iron Horse Engineering Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to McConway & Torley, LLC company.

In the current year, Iron Horse Engineering Company company and McConway & Torley, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Iron Horse Engineering Company company nor McConway & Torley, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Iron Horse Engineering Company company nor McConway & Torley, LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Iron Horse Engineering Company company nor McConway & Torley, LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither McConway & Torley, LLC company nor Iron Horse Engineering Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither McConway & Torley, LLC nor Iron Horse Engineering Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither McConway & Torley, LLC company nor Iron Horse Engineering Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

McConway & Torley, LLC company employs more people globally than Iron Horse Engineering Company company, reflecting its scale as a Railroad Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither McConway & Torley, LLC nor Iron Horse Engineering Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither McConway & Torley, LLC nor Iron Horse Engineering Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither McConway & Torley, LLC nor Iron Horse Engineering Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither McConway & Torley, LLC nor Iron Horse Engineering Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither McConway & Torley, LLC nor Iron Horse Engineering Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither McConway & Torley, LLC nor Iron Horse Engineering Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H