Comparison Overview

McClelland Laboratories, Inc.

VS

Impact Energy Services Inc.

McClelland Laboratories, Inc.

1016 Greg St, Sparks, Nevada 89431-6040, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

McClelland Laboratories, Inc. has been providing quality laboratory and consulting services to the minerals industry since 1987. Our services include metallurgical, environmental, analytical testing and consulting to meet the needs of our clients during all phases of project development, operation and closure. What started as a lab dedicated to the gold, silver and copper industries has expanded to provide services in a wide range of mineral markets.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Impact Energy Services Inc.

147 Liberty Street, Suite 213, Toronto, Ontario, M6K 3G3, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Impact Energy is a trusted name in energy consulting for small to medium size business. We reduce operating expenses relating to energy for commercial, industrial and multi-unit residential building owners. Buildings typically waste one third of the energy they consume and with electricity prices rising by 8% annually, actively managing energy is becoming extremely important. Not managing energy contributes to: ● high operating expenses ● poor building performance Energy is the greatest area of opportunity to save money. We provide the following services: • Utility Bill Analysis • Energy Auditing • Building Retrofit Projects • Remote Energy Management • Incentive and Grant Application Our services are designed to help operate your building more efficiently improving: ● Profitability ● Building efficiency, and ● Brand image by becoming a green

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcclelland-laboratories-inc.jpeg
McClelland Laboratories, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/impact-energy-services-inc-.jpeg
Impact Energy Services Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
McClelland Laboratories, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Impact Energy Services Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McClelland Laboratories, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Impact Energy Services Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — McClelland Laboratories, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McClelland Laboratories, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Impact Energy Services Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Impact Energy Services Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcclelland-laboratories-inc.jpeg
McClelland Laboratories, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/impact-energy-services-inc-.jpeg
Impact Energy Services Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

McClelland Laboratories, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Impact Energy Services Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Impact Energy Services Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to McClelland Laboratories, Inc. company.

In the current year, Impact Energy Services Inc. company and McClelland Laboratories, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Impact Energy Services Inc. company nor McClelland Laboratories, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Impact Energy Services Inc. company nor McClelland Laboratories, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Impact Energy Services Inc. company nor McClelland Laboratories, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither McClelland Laboratories, Inc. company nor Impact Energy Services Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither McClelland Laboratories, Inc. nor Impact Energy Services Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither McClelland Laboratories, Inc. company nor Impact Energy Services Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

McClelland Laboratories, Inc. company employs more people globally than Impact Energy Services Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither McClelland Laboratories, Inc. nor Impact Energy Services Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither McClelland Laboratories, Inc. nor Impact Energy Services Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither McClelland Laboratories, Inc. nor Impact Energy Services Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither McClelland Laboratories, Inc. nor Impact Energy Services Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither McClelland Laboratories, Inc. nor Impact Energy Services Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither McClelland Laboratories, Inc. nor Impact Energy Services Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H