Comparison Overview

MCC Label

VS

Amcor

MCC Label

6111 N River Rd, None, Rosemont, Illinois, US, 60018
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.mcclabel.com

As the global leader of premium labels, MCC helps brands stand out in competitive markets and inspire positive consumer experiences. With a network of 12,000+ teammates and facilities across 25+ countries and six continents, we combine global reach with the personalized touch of local service. Our experienced team is here to assist you with an array of label solutions and diverse market expertise. By combining a collaborative approach and a wide range of value-added services, MCC aims to be your label partner from concept to commercialization. Backed by over a century of printing experience, MCC is focused on the future by developing consumer-driven innovations and sustainable packaging solutions.

NAICS: 326112
NAICS Definition: Plastics Packaging Film and Sheet (including Laminated) Manufacturing
Employees: 4,313
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Amcor

Thurgauerstrasse 34, Zurich, CH-8050, CH
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.amcor.com

As a global leader in packaging solutions for consumer and healthcare products, our industry-leading innovation capabilities, global scale and technical expertise help our customers grow and meet the needs of millions of consumers every day. We accelerate the possible by redefining what can be done, constantly anticipating what our customers will need next, rethinking what is scientifically feasible and always helping our customers find the right solution to their challenges. Social Media Community Guidelines Thank you for being part of our online community and contributing to our discussions by sharing your voice. We’re happy to have you here and are committed to fostering a welcoming, respectful and engaging community. We encourage open conversation and do not pre-screen or moderate comments or messages before they are posted. However, we reserve the right to remove content that violates our community guidelines outlined below. - Off-topic or clearly misrepresents Amcor - Includes hate speech, discriminatory remarks or any attacks based on someone’s race, ethnicity, gender, religion, nationality or other personal characteristics - Misleading or deceptive content that promotes fraud or false information - Irrelevant to the conversation, including spam, promotional or trolling - Potentially violates copyright laws and/or any form of intellectual property rights - We appreciate your cooperation in maintaining a positive space for all. Thank you for helping us create a positive and respectful community.

NAICS: 326112
NAICS Definition: Plastics Packaging Film and Sheet (including Laminated) Manufacturing
Employees: 33,108
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcclabel.jpeg
MCC Label
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amcor.jpeg
Amcor
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MCC Label
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Amcor
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Packaging and Containers Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MCC Label in 2025.

Incidents vs Packaging and Containers Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amcor in 2025.

Incident History — MCC Label (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MCC Label cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Amcor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amcor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcclabel.jpeg
MCC Label
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amcor.jpeg
Amcor
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Amcor company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MCC Label company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

MCC Label company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Amcor company has not reported any.

In the current year, Amcor company and MCC Label company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Amcor company nor MCC Label company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

MCC Label company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Amcor company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Amcor company nor MCC Label company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MCC Label company nor Amcor company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MCC Label nor Amcor holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Amcor company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to MCC Label company.

Amcor company employs more people globally than MCC Label company, reflecting its scale as a Packaging and Containers Manufacturing.

Neither MCC Label nor Amcor holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MCC Label nor Amcor holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MCC Label nor Amcor holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MCC Label nor Amcor holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MCC Label nor Amcor holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MCC Label nor Amcor holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References