Comparison Overview

McCarthy, Leonard and Kaemmerer, L.C.

VS

Knochel Law Office

McCarthy, Leonard and Kaemmerer, L.C.

825 Maryville Centre Dr, Town and Country, Missouri, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1984, McCarthy, Leonard & Kaemmerer L.C. provides experienced and efficient legal representation both in general practice areas and in specialized areas of the law. The firm represents management in labor and employment law and practices in the areas of insurance, products liability, environmental, commercial transactions, tax, real estate and estate planning law. The firm also represents individuals in a criminal, personal injury or family law capacity. Business clients encompass a wide range of industries including manufacturing, construction, retail, service, insurance, publishing and health care. Public sector clients range from municipalities and school boards to ambulance and fire districts. While the firm has many clients that are large and mid-market corporations, it also serves smaller businesses, individuals and not-for-profit organizations.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Knochel Law Office

1967 Highway 95, Bullhead City, AZ, 86442, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

At Knochel Law Office, we are devoted to aggressive representation of our clients'​ interests. If you are involved in a dispute, we are fully prepared to go to trial, but we also have the negotiation and mediation skills to pursue fair outcomes out of court. We are a law firm that can meet a wide range of legal needs effectively and efficiently. We practice law in a variety of key practice areas. Whether you need help with criminal charges, bankruptcy, family issues, business disputes or estate planning, we have the experience and knowledge of the law that you deserve on your side. Our team of attorneys is led by Keith S. Knochel, who has been practicing law area of Arizona, Nevada and California for more than 35 years. Widely recognized as one of the more experienced legal advocates in the region, Mr. Knochel is joined by a strong group of qualified lawyers and support staff.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mccarthy-leonard-and-kaemmerer-l-c.jpeg
McCarthy, Leonard and Kaemmerer, L.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/knochel-law-firm.jpeg
Knochel Law Office
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
McCarthy, Leonard and Kaemmerer, L.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Knochel Law Office
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McCarthy, Leonard and Kaemmerer, L.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Knochel Law Office in 2025.

Incident History — McCarthy, Leonard and Kaemmerer, L.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McCarthy, Leonard and Kaemmerer, L.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Knochel Law Office (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Knochel Law Office cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mccarthy-leonard-and-kaemmerer-l-c.jpeg
McCarthy, Leonard and Kaemmerer, L.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/knochel-law-firm.jpeg
Knochel Law Office
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both McCarthy, Leonard and Kaemmerer, L.C. company and Knochel Law Office company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Knochel Law Office company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to McCarthy, Leonard and Kaemmerer, L.C. company.

In the current year, Knochel Law Office company and McCarthy, Leonard and Kaemmerer, L.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Knochel Law Office company nor McCarthy, Leonard and Kaemmerer, L.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Knochel Law Office company nor McCarthy, Leonard and Kaemmerer, L.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Knochel Law Office company nor McCarthy, Leonard and Kaemmerer, L.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither McCarthy, Leonard and Kaemmerer, L.C. company nor Knochel Law Office company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither McCarthy, Leonard and Kaemmerer, L.C. nor Knochel Law Office holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither McCarthy, Leonard and Kaemmerer, L.C. company nor Knochel Law Office company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

McCarthy, Leonard and Kaemmerer, L.C. company employs more people globally than Knochel Law Office company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither McCarthy, Leonard and Kaemmerer, L.C. nor Knochel Law Office holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither McCarthy, Leonard and Kaemmerer, L.C. nor Knochel Law Office holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither McCarthy, Leonard and Kaemmerer, L.C. nor Knochel Law Office holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither McCarthy, Leonard and Kaemmerer, L.C. nor Knochel Law Office holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither McCarthy, Leonard and Kaemmerer, L.C. nor Knochel Law Office holds HIPAA certification.

Neither McCarthy, Leonard and Kaemmerer, L.C. nor Knochel Law Office holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X