Comparison Overview

McCarthy & McCarthy, LLP

VS

Connolly Suthers Lawyers

McCarthy & McCarthy, LLP

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

McCarthy & McCarthy, LLP is comprised of highly experienced attorneys who specialize in construction, corporate risk management, business, contract negotiation and assessment, real estate, employment, professional liability, and general liability claims. The firm is committed to providing its clients with the most effective, pro-active legal representation possible. McCarthy & McCarthy, LLP is a result-oriented practice that relies on expertise, efficiency, and dedication. The firm was founded on the principle that the client deserves the highest quality legal services at the most acceptable cost. It is McCarthy & McCarthy’s priority to provide informative, analytical, and timely reporting on the status of cases so the client is always apprised of its position. The firm’s responsiveness fosters the client’s trust and engenders credibility, both of which are essential to any meaningful relationship. The client’s success is McCarthy & McCarthy’s bottom line.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Connolly Suthers Lawyers

AMP Building, 416 Flinders Street, Townsville City, QLD, 4810, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Connolly Suthers Lawyers is glad to be celebrating 125 years in practicing Law. We are a multi-disciplinary practice which serves our district, here, in North Queensland well. By combining extensively trained and experienced legal practitioners with state-of-the-art communications and technology, Connolly Suthers delivers a level of legal service that is unrivalled in the region. Read on below, navigate to our new website, or just simply call us now on (07) 4771 5664.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
McCarthy & McCarthy, LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/connolly-suthers-lawyers.jpeg
Connolly Suthers Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
McCarthy & McCarthy, LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Connolly Suthers Lawyers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McCarthy & McCarthy, LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Connolly Suthers Lawyers in 2025.

Incident History — McCarthy & McCarthy, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McCarthy & McCarthy, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Connolly Suthers Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Connolly Suthers Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
McCarthy & McCarthy, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/connolly-suthers-lawyers.jpeg
Connolly Suthers Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

McCarthy & McCarthy, LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Connolly Suthers Lawyers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Connolly Suthers Lawyers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to McCarthy & McCarthy, LLP company.

In the current year, Connolly Suthers Lawyers company and McCarthy & McCarthy, LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Connolly Suthers Lawyers company nor McCarthy & McCarthy, LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Connolly Suthers Lawyers company nor McCarthy & McCarthy, LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Connolly Suthers Lawyers company nor McCarthy & McCarthy, LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither McCarthy & McCarthy, LLP company nor Connolly Suthers Lawyers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither McCarthy & McCarthy, LLP nor Connolly Suthers Lawyers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither McCarthy & McCarthy, LLP company nor Connolly Suthers Lawyers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Connolly Suthers Lawyers company employs more people globally than McCarthy & McCarthy, LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither McCarthy & McCarthy, LLP nor Connolly Suthers Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither McCarthy & McCarthy, LLP nor Connolly Suthers Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither McCarthy & McCarthy, LLP nor Connolly Suthers Lawyers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither McCarthy & McCarthy, LLP nor Connolly Suthers Lawyers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither McCarthy & McCarthy, LLP nor Connolly Suthers Lawyers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither McCarthy & McCarthy, LLP nor Connolly Suthers Lawyers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X