Comparison Overview

McCall Hamilton

VS

Spring Regulatory Sciences

McCall Hamilton

106 W. Allegan St., Lansing, 48933, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mccallhamilton.com

McCall Hamilton is a bipartisan lobbying, regulatory consulting, and grassroots advocacy firm in Lansing. With more than three decades of experience in Michigan policy, our firm advocates for clients across many fields including: medical, behavioral health, public health, energy and agriculture, insurance, criminal justice, judiciary, and housing and workforce issues. We are also experts in Certificate of Need policy and contract procurement. Across all of these focus areas, we uphold a drive for substantive engagement in the legislative and regulatory arenas.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Spring Regulatory Sciences

6620 Cypresswood Dr, Ste 250, Spring, 77379, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
https://springregulatorysciences.com

Spring Regulatory Sciences is a regulatory services consulting firm. We have decades of experience both within EPA and within industry, working on behalf of inert and active chemical firms. Spring Regulatory Sciences has experience in meeting the registration requirements in over 100 countries worldwide and will work on your behalf to increase your reach in the global market. Over 3 decades of EPA experience in the basic, generic and inert industries. Negotiated successful data compensation cases. Lead industry Task Forces. EPA Registration Eligibility Document (RED) reviews and rebuttals. Company representation before registration agencies throughout the world. Spring Regulatory Sciences works with the top laboratories in the industry to produce OECD and U.S. GLP data to support your applications, rebuttals, and data call-ins. For the cost of hiring a less experienced full time employee you can have the advantage of a highly experienced and extremely productive registration specialist.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mccall-hamilton.jpeg
McCall Hamilton
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spring-trading-company.jpeg
Spring Regulatory Sciences
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
McCall Hamilton
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Spring Regulatory Sciences
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McCall Hamilton in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Spring Regulatory Sciences in 2025.

Incident History — McCall Hamilton (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McCall Hamilton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Spring Regulatory Sciences (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Spring Regulatory Sciences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mccall-hamilton.jpeg
McCall Hamilton
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spring-trading-company.jpeg
Spring Regulatory Sciences
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Spring Regulatory Sciences company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to McCall Hamilton company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Spring Regulatory Sciences company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to McCall Hamilton company.

In the current year, Spring Regulatory Sciences company and McCall Hamilton company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Spring Regulatory Sciences company nor McCall Hamilton company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Spring Regulatory Sciences company nor McCall Hamilton company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Spring Regulatory Sciences company nor McCall Hamilton company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither McCall Hamilton company nor Spring Regulatory Sciences company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither McCall Hamilton nor Spring Regulatory Sciences holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither McCall Hamilton company nor Spring Regulatory Sciences company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Spring Regulatory Sciences company employs more people globally than McCall Hamilton company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither McCall Hamilton nor Spring Regulatory Sciences holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither McCall Hamilton nor Spring Regulatory Sciences holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither McCall Hamilton nor Spring Regulatory Sciences holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither McCall Hamilton nor Spring Regulatory Sciences holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither McCall Hamilton nor Spring Regulatory Sciences holds HIPAA certification.

Neither McCall Hamilton nor Spring Regulatory Sciences holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References