Comparison Overview

MCB Bank Limited

VS

Capitec

MCB Bank Limited

15 Main Gulberg, Lahore, undefined, -, PK
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mcb.com.pk

Welcome to the Official LinkedIn page of MCB Bank Limited. Established in 1947, MCB Bank Limited is one of the largest Banks in Pakistan with a total customer base exceeding 7 million. We have products and services to suit the every need of customers. To learn more about MCB Bank, please visit our website www.mcb.com.pk or call the MCB Contact Center 111-000-622. Disclaimer: MCB Bank will never ask for our customer’s personal data on any public platform. Please avoid sharing any such data via social media.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 13,689
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Capitec

5 Neutron Road, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, ZA, 7600
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
http://www.capitecbank.co.za

Imagine simple, affordable banking solutions that work for you – just like it does for over 25 million South Africans. They’re banking smart, paying less and getting more value every day with us. As the country’s leading digital bank, we’re proud to have been voted the Coolest Bank by the youth in the 2024 Sunday Times GenNext Awards. With 880 branches and a team of over 16,900, we’re here to grow with you.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 21,561
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcb-bank-limited.jpeg
MCB Bank Limited
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capitec-bank.jpeg
Capitec
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MCB Bank Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Capitec
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MCB Bank Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Capitec in 2025.

Incident History — MCB Bank Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MCB Bank Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Capitec (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capitec cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcb-bank-limited.jpeg
MCB Bank Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capitec-bank.jpeg
Capitec
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Capitec company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MCB Bank Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Capitec company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MCB Bank Limited company.

In the current year, Capitec company and MCB Bank Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Capitec company nor MCB Bank Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Capitec company nor MCB Bank Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Capitec company nor MCB Bank Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MCB Bank Limited company nor Capitec company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MCB Bank Limited nor Capitec holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither MCB Bank Limited company nor Capitec company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Capitec company employs more people globally than MCB Bank Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither MCB Bank Limited nor Capitec holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MCB Bank Limited nor Capitec holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MCB Bank Limited nor Capitec holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MCB Bank Limited nor Capitec holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MCB Bank Limited nor Capitec holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MCB Bank Limited nor Capitec holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References