Comparison Overview

MCB Bank Limited

VS

CaixaBank

MCB Bank Limited

15 Main Gulberg, Lahore, undefined, -, PK
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Welcome to the Official LinkedIn page of MCB Bank Limited. Established in 1947, MCB Bank Limited is one of the largest Banks in Pakistan with a total customer base exceeding 7 million. We have products and services to suit the every need of customers. To learn more about MCB Bank, please visit our website www.mcb.com.pk or call the MCB Contact Center 111-000-622. Disclaimer: MCB Bank will never ask for our customer’s personal data on any public platform. Please avoid sharing any such data via social media.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 13,689
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CaixaBank

Pintor Sorolla, 2-4, Valencia , undefined, 46002, ES
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849

We are the leading financial group in the Spanish market, comprised of banking business, insurance activity and investments in international banks and leading companies in the services sector. CaixaBank is a financial group with a socially responsible, long-term universal banking model, based on quality, trust, and specialisation, which offers a value proposition of products and services adapted for each sector, adopting innovation as a strategic challenge and a distinguishing feature of its corporate culture, and whose leading position in retail banking in Spain and Portugal makes it a key player in supporting sustainable economic growth.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 20,355
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcb-bank-limited.jpeg
MCB Bank Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/caixabank.jpeg
CaixaBank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MCB Bank Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CaixaBank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MCB Bank Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CaixaBank in 2025.

Incident History — MCB Bank Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MCB Bank Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CaixaBank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CaixaBank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcb-bank-limited.jpeg
MCB Bank Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/caixabank.jpeg
CaixaBank
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CaixaBank company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MCB Bank Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CaixaBank company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MCB Bank Limited company.

In the current year, CaixaBank company and MCB Bank Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CaixaBank company nor MCB Bank Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CaixaBank company nor MCB Bank Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CaixaBank company nor MCB Bank Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MCB Bank Limited company nor CaixaBank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MCB Bank Limited nor CaixaBank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CaixaBank company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to MCB Bank Limited company.

CaixaBank company employs more people globally than MCB Bank Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither MCB Bank Limited nor CaixaBank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MCB Bank Limited nor CaixaBank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MCB Bank Limited nor CaixaBank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MCB Bank Limited nor CaixaBank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MCB Bank Limited nor CaixaBank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MCB Bank Limited nor CaixaBank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H