Comparison Overview

Maymont

VS

Historic Royal Palaces

Maymont

1700 Hampton St., Richmond, 23220, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

Maymont, located in the heart of Richmond, Virginia, is a well-preserved 100 acres where all are welcome to connect with history, nature, wildlife and each other. Built as a Gilded Age estate overlooking the James River, Maymont opened to the public in 1926 and today offers free admission to explore its miles of walking paths through rolling hills, beautiful landscaped gardens, a petting farm and the Virginia Wildlife Trail with habitats for rescued native animals. In addition, Maymont offers guided and self-guided tours of the 1893 Maymont Mansion, historic estate buildings and gardens, plus the immersive Run of the River” experience highlighting the remarkable ecology of the James River in The Robins Nature Center. Since 1975, the nonprofit Maymont Foundation has been entrusted to care for this unique place, galvanizing community support around its mission to delight, educate and inspire all who visit. Maymont annually welcomes over 800,000 guests and is consistently ranked among the region’s top attractions by travelers and locals alike.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 119
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Historic Royal Palaces

East Molesey, Surrey, GB, KT8 9AU
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

We are the charity who love and look after Hampton Court Palace, Kensington Palace, Tower of London, the Banqueting House, Kew Palace, and Hillsborough Castle and Gardens. The palaces are the setting for the stories that shape us all, and we’re bringing them to people in ways that mean more to them. We want everyone to find themselves in the spaces and stories we share. The palaces are owned by The King on behalf of the nation. As an independent charity, we raise all our own funds and depend on the support of our visitors, members, donors, sponsors and volunteers.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 936
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maymont.jpeg
Maymont
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-royal-palaces.jpeg
Historic Royal Palaces
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Maymont
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Historic Royal Palaces
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Maymont in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historic Royal Palaces in 2026.

Incident History — Maymont (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Maymont cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Historic Royal Palaces (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historic Royal Palaces cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maymont.jpeg
Maymont
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-royal-palaces.jpeg
Historic Royal Palaces
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Historic Royal Palaces company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Maymont company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Historic Royal Palaces company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Maymont company.

In the current year, Historic Royal Palaces company and Maymont company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Historic Royal Palaces company nor Maymont company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Historic Royal Palaces company nor Maymont company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Historic Royal Palaces company nor Maymont company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Maymont company nor Historic Royal Palaces company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Maymont nor Historic Royal Palaces holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Maymont company nor Historic Royal Palaces company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Historic Royal Palaces company employs more people globally than Maymont company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Maymont nor Historic Royal Palaces holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Maymont nor Historic Royal Palaces holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Maymont nor Historic Royal Palaces holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Maymont nor Historic Royal Palaces holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Maymont nor Historic Royal Palaces holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Maymont nor Historic Royal Palaces holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the processBackgroundAction() function in all versions up to, and including, 10.0.04. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify global map engine settings.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The Save as PDF Plugin by PDFCrowd plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘options’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. NOTE: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires that the PDFCrowd API key is blank (also known as "demo mode", which is the default configuration when the plugin is installed) or known.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Hustle – Email Marketing, Lead Generation, Optins, Popups plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to incorrect file type validation in the action_import_module() function in all versions up to, and including, 7.8.9.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with a lower-privileged role (e.g., Subscriber-level access and above), to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. Successful exploitation requires an admin to grant Hustle module permissions (or module edit access) to the low-privileged user so they can access the Hustle admin page and obtain the required nonce.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

The WP Directory Kit plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.9 via the wdk_public_action AJAX handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract email addresses for users with Directory Kit-specific user roles.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Meta-box GalleryMeta plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with editor-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N