Comparison Overview

Maymont

VS

Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ)

Maymont

1700 Hampton St., Richmond, 23220, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.maymont.org

Maymont, located in the heart of Richmond, Virginia, is a well-preserved 100 acres where all are welcome to connect with history, nature, wildlife and each other. Built as a Gilded Age estate overlooking the James River, Maymont opened to the public in 1926 and today offers free admission to explore its miles of walking paths through rolling hills, beautiful landscaped gardens, a petting farm and the Virginia Wildlife Trail with habitats for rescued native animals. In addition, Maymont offers guided and self-guided tours of the 1893 Maymont Mansion, historic estate buildings and gardens, plus the immersive Run of the River” experience highlighting the remarkable ecology of the James River in The Robins Nature Center. Since 1975, the nonprofit Maymont Foundation has been entrusted to care for this unique place, galvanizing community support around its mission to delight, educate and inspire all who visit. Maymont annually welcomes over 800,000 guests and is consistently ranked among the region’s top attractions by travelers and locals alike.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 119
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ)

1825 Rue Semple, Quebec, Quebec, G1N 4B7, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ccq.gouv.qc.ca/

Depuis 1979, le Centre de conservation du Québec a pour mission de contribuer à la restauration et à la conservation préventive du patrimoine du Québec. Relevant du ministère de la Culture et des Communications du Québec (MCCQ), le Centre regroupe la plus importante équipe de spécialistes de la conservation et de la restauration du patrimoine au Québec. Le soutien financier du MCCQ permet le regroupement d'une équipe pluridisciplinaire de spécialistes capable d'assurer des services touchant des objets et œuvres d'art de tous types de matériaux, de nature simple ou de très grande envergure, en atelier ou à l'extérieur, auprès d'une vaste clientèle. Cette approche synergique garantit l'utilisation optimale d'une précieuse expertise et d'infrastructures coûteuses. Le Centre dispose en effet de locaux et d'équipements spécialisés, sécuritaires et adaptés aux besoins des œuvres et des restaurateurs. Consultez la nétiquette du CCQ : https://www.mcc.gouv.qc.ca/index.php?id=5421#c31378

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 45
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maymont.jpeg
Maymont
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centre-conservation-quebec.jpeg
Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Maymont
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Maymont in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) in 2026.

Incident History — Maymont (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Maymont cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maymont.jpeg
Maymont
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centre-conservation-quebec.jpeg
Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Maymont company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Maymont company.

In the current year, Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) company and Maymont company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) company nor Maymont company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) company nor Maymont company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) company nor Maymont company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Maymont company nor Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Maymont nor Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Maymont company.

Maymont company employs more people globally than Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Maymont nor Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Maymont nor Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Maymont nor Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Maymont nor Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Maymont nor Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Maymont nor Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References