Comparison Overview

Mayfair Casino Ltd

VS

SPIELO

Mayfair Casino Ltd

20 North Audley Street, London, W1K 6LX, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Mayfair Casino Ltd is one of the newest operators of land-based casinos in London. Bringing flair and dynamism to London’s gambling scene, its portfolio includes such famous establishments as Horizons – Leicester Square’s longest serving casino – and Mayfair’s iconic Clermont Club, one of the first casinos to open in the UK. With an aristocratic history and a history of gaming dating back to 1962, located in a stunning townhouse originally built in 1740, the newly refurbished Clermont Club will mix classic architecture and modern luxury with opulence and refinement.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 61
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SPIELO

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

A Winning Combination. GTECH, the largest global lottery business, and IGT, the world leader in the gaming equipment space, have merged to create the world's leading end-to-end gaming company. By adopting the IGT name and GTECH's visual identity, we've melded two iconic brands into one. Together, we're uniquely positioned to provide the government-sponsored and commercial gaming industry with proven solutions across the entire continuum of products and channels. The SPIELO brand represents a complete range of end-to-end gaming products for diverse gaming segments, including distributed government-sponsored markets, commercial casino markets, and Amusement With Prize (AWP) markets.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 129
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mayfair-casino-limited.jpeg
Mayfair Casino Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spielo.jpeg
SPIELO
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mayfair Casino Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SPIELO
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mayfair Casino Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SPIELO in 2025.

Incident History — Mayfair Casino Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mayfair Casino Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SPIELO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SPIELO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mayfair-casino-limited.jpeg
Mayfair Casino Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spielo.jpeg
SPIELO
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Mayfair Casino Ltd company and SPIELO company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, SPIELO company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mayfair Casino Ltd company.

In the current year, SPIELO company and Mayfair Casino Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SPIELO company nor Mayfair Casino Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SPIELO company nor Mayfair Casino Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SPIELO company nor Mayfair Casino Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mayfair Casino Ltd company nor SPIELO company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mayfair Casino Ltd nor SPIELO holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mayfair Casino Ltd company nor SPIELO company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SPIELO company employs more people globally than Mayfair Casino Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Mayfair Casino Ltd nor SPIELO holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mayfair Casino Ltd nor SPIELO holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mayfair Casino Ltd nor SPIELO holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mayfair Casino Ltd nor SPIELO holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mayfair Casino Ltd nor SPIELO holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mayfair Casino Ltd nor SPIELO holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H