Comparison Overview

Mayborn Group Limited

VS

Prysmian

Mayborn Group Limited

Mayborn Group Ltd, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Northumberland, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://mayborngroup.com

At Mayborn Group, we’re the proud owner of global baby brand tommee tippee®. Our award-winning brand was launched in the UK over 50 years ago and our range of feeding, soothing and hygiene products is now available in over 60 countries worldwide. With a reputation for producing stylish, innovative products, we’re passionate about helping mums and dads to embrace and enjoy the rollercoaster ride of bringing up baby. Our vision is to be the world's most loved baby company. Our values guide us in how we work as one global team to deliver our vision. We take pride, we are in it together, we are bold, we play to win and we respect each other. Headquartered in North East England, we have offices worldwide including Paris, Connecticut, Melbourne and Hong Kong and factories in Morocco, the UK and China.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 355
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Prysmian

Via Chiese 6, Milan, Italy, 20126, IT
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)
Between 750 and 799
http://www.prysmian.com

Prysmian is a global cabling solutions provider leading the energy transition and digital transformation. By leveraging its wide geographical footprint and extensive product range, its track record of technological leadership and innovation, and a strong customer base, the company is well-placed to capitalise on its leading positions and win in new, growing markets. Prysmian’s business strategy perfectly matches key market drivers by developing resilient, high-performing, sustainable and innovative cable solutions in the segments of Transmission, Power Grid, Electrification and Digital Solutions. Prysmian is a public company listed on the Italian Stock Exchange, with almost 150 years of experience, over 33,000 employees, 109 plants and 27 R&D centres in over 50 countries, and sales of over €15 billion in 2023.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 13,580
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mayborn-group-limited.jpeg
Mayborn Group Limited
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prysmian.jpeg
Prysmian
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mayborn Group Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Prysmian
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mayborn Group Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prysmian in 2025.

Incident History — Mayborn Group Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mayborn Group Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Prysmian (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prysmian cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mayborn-group-limited.jpeg
Mayborn Group Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prysmian.jpeg
Prysmian
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Prysmian company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mayborn Group Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Prysmian company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mayborn Group Limited company.

In the current year, Prysmian company and Mayborn Group Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Prysmian company nor Mayborn Group Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Prysmian company nor Mayborn Group Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Prysmian company nor Mayborn Group Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mayborn Group Limited company nor Prysmian company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mayborn Group Limited nor Prysmian holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Prysmian company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Mayborn Group Limited company.

Prysmian company employs more people globally than Mayborn Group Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither Mayborn Group Limited nor Prysmian holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mayborn Group Limited nor Prysmian holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mayborn Group Limited nor Prysmian holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mayborn Group Limited nor Prysmian holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mayborn Group Limited nor Prysmian holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mayborn Group Limited nor Prysmian holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The Bold Page Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘percentage’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 5.4.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The ComboServlet in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.2, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.5, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions does not limit the number or size of the files it will combine, which allows remote attackers to create very large responses that lead to a denial of service attack via the URL query string.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and delete arbitrary directories on the target machine.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and create arbitrary directories on the target machine.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and delete arbitrary files on the target machine.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References