Comparison Overview

Maxwell-Jade Investigations

VS

Parker Stanbury, LLP

Maxwell-Jade Investigations

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Are you tired of receiving incomplete, out-dated, and inaccurate reports from commercial web sites selling instant background checks? As licensed private investigators we can offer you a "hands-on; weed thru the muck" source for searches. We use proprietary data bases only available to law enforcement, the legal trade and private investigators. tele: 253-302-3740 9-5 M-F PST

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Parker Stanbury, LLP

444 S FLOWER ST, Los Angeles, 90071, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 800 and 849

For more than 80 years, providing the highest quality legal services expeditiously and at the most reasonable cost. Parker • Stanbury LLP began in 1927 when Harry Parker came West to begin practicing law in the State of California. In the years that followed, he was joined by such outstanding advocates and trial attorneys as Ray Stanbury, White McGee, Jr., and Dick Reese. These prominent attorneys formed the nucleus of the sound and respected law firm that is Parker • Stanbury LLP. The tradition of excellent legal service and representation initiated by Mr. Parker and his partners continues through the present.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maxwell-jade-inc-.jpeg
Maxwell-Jade Investigations
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Parker Stanbury, LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Maxwell-Jade Investigations
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Parker Stanbury, LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Maxwell-Jade Investigations in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Parker Stanbury, LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Maxwell-Jade Investigations (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Maxwell-Jade Investigations cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Parker Stanbury, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Parker Stanbury, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maxwell-jade-inc-.jpeg
Maxwell-Jade Investigations
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Parker Stanbury, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Parker Stanbury, LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Maxwell-Jade Investigations company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Parker Stanbury, LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Maxwell-Jade Investigations company.

In the current year, Parker Stanbury, LLP company and Maxwell-Jade Investigations company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Parker Stanbury, LLP company nor Maxwell-Jade Investigations company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Parker Stanbury, LLP company nor Maxwell-Jade Investigations company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Parker Stanbury, LLP company nor Maxwell-Jade Investigations company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Maxwell-Jade Investigations company nor Parker Stanbury, LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Maxwell-Jade Investigations nor Parker Stanbury, LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Maxwell-Jade Investigations company nor Parker Stanbury, LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Parker Stanbury, LLP company employs more people globally than Maxwell-Jade Investigations company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Maxwell-Jade Investigations nor Parker Stanbury, LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Maxwell-Jade Investigations nor Parker Stanbury, LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Maxwell-Jade Investigations nor Parker Stanbury, LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Maxwell-Jade Investigations nor Parker Stanbury, LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Maxwell-Jade Investigations nor Parker Stanbury, LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Maxwell-Jade Investigations nor Parker Stanbury, LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X