Comparison Overview

Maxine Jutras designer graphique

VS

MEKA

Maxine Jutras designer graphique

380 rue de la Couronne 1605 Québec, Québec G1K 0G5, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Maxine Jutras designer graphique est un studio de Québec offrant des services intégrés de communication d'entreprise : identité, design de marque, rapport annuel, brochure, catalogue, signalisation, web. Grâce à un réseau de collaborateurs passionnés et expérimentés, nos mandats varient selon la taille et l'envergure de vos projets. NOTRE VISION EST DE METTRE EN VALEUR CE QUI VOUS DISTINGUE !

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MEKA

undefined, Montreal , Qc, undefined, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Born in the beginning of the 80’s (and still living in them) in the east end of France, Meka started out illustration and design in Paris with clients such as Sony, Universal, Puma, and DC. In 2008, he took a one way ticket to Montreal, Canada, with a suitcase fully loaded with New Eras and new ideas, to pursue collaborations with Psyop, 123KLAN, La Fraise, Blood Sweat Vector, Koralie & Supakitch and Kolorys.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maxine-jutras-designer-graphique.jpeg
Maxine Jutras designer graphique
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meka.jpeg
MEKA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Maxine Jutras designer graphique
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MEKA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Maxine Jutras designer graphique in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MEKA in 2025.

Incident History — Maxine Jutras designer graphique (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Maxine Jutras designer graphique cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MEKA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MEKA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maxine-jutras-designer-graphique.jpeg
Maxine Jutras designer graphique
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meka.jpeg
MEKA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

MEKA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Maxine Jutras designer graphique company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MEKA company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Maxine Jutras designer graphique company.

In the current year, MEKA company and Maxine Jutras designer graphique company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MEKA company nor Maxine Jutras designer graphique company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MEKA company nor Maxine Jutras designer graphique company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MEKA company nor Maxine Jutras designer graphique company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Maxine Jutras designer graphique company nor MEKA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Maxine Jutras designer graphique nor MEKA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Maxine Jutras designer graphique company nor MEKA company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

MEKA company employs more people globally than Maxine Jutras designer graphique company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Maxine Jutras designer graphique nor MEKA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Maxine Jutras designer graphique nor MEKA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Maxine Jutras designer graphique nor MEKA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Maxine Jutras designer graphique nor MEKA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Maxine Jutras designer graphique nor MEKA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Maxine Jutras designer graphique nor MEKA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X