Comparison Overview

MaxBet

VS

Chisholm Bookmakers Ltd

MaxBet

Bulevar heroja sa Kosara, New Belgrade, RS
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

MaxBet, a part of the international leader Flutter International, distinguishes itself in the gaming industry as a company dedicated to innovation and advanced technological solutions. Since its inception in 1993, MaxBet has expanded its presence to over 200 cities across Serbia and the region, including Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and North Macedonia. With a network of more than 450 locations MaxBet continues to grow and evolve. Our team of over 3,000 dedicated professionals continually strives to enhance our services, ensuring an exceptional user experience and maintaining player satisfaction. We believe that high-quality people are the key to success. That’s why we invest in the growth and wellbeing of our employees, fostering a work environment that promotes security, innovation and flexibility. We empower our team to push the boundaries of our business while enjoying a dynamic and engaging atmosphere. Our mission is to deliver the highest-quality portfolio of games of chance through cutting-edge, internally developed software solutions. We are committed to providing a superior user experience based on a deep understanding of player behaviors and needs, both in our physical locations and online. MaxBet plays a significant role in the business sector and local economies, directly employing more than 3,000 people and indirectly supporting around 15,000 jobs through stable business partnerships. Our vision is to offer a seamless and comprehensive user experience through an omnichannel approach, providing entertainment whenever and wherever our players desire it. By integrating the latest IT standards and unique relations with our employees and players, we continuously create value added for our company, partners and the society as a whole. Innovation is the generator of our development and people are a key to our success. We know that life is a game, and together, we’re playing it to the fullest!

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 674
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Chisholm Bookmakers Ltd

Ashington, NE63 8UB, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

We are long established, family-owned company operating thirty four licensed betting shops in the North-East of England and Cumbria. If you live in the Northumberland, Newcastle, Tyne Valley, Cumbria, County Durham or Middlesbrough areas, then there's a Chisholm Bookmakers betting shop nearby! Visit any of our offices and you can bet on a wide variety of sports. We offer odds on horseracing, greyhound racing, football, cricket, golf, NFL, snooker, boxing, tennis and most other sports. All of our shops are equipped to accept tote direct bets. We accept bets on Virtual Racing, the outcome of the Irish and Spanish lotteries, and offer other daily numbers games, such as 49's and Rapido. All our shops also offer a range of the latest B3 Gaming Machines which provide slots and games based on Roulette, Blackjack and Bingo.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maxbet.jpeg
MaxBet
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chisholm-bookmakers-ltd.jpeg
Chisholm Bookmakers Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MaxBet
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chisholm Bookmakers Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MaxBet in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chisholm Bookmakers Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — MaxBet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MaxBet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chisholm Bookmakers Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chisholm Bookmakers Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maxbet.jpeg
MaxBet
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chisholm-bookmakers-ltd.jpeg
Chisholm Bookmakers Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

MaxBet company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Chisholm Bookmakers Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Chisholm Bookmakers Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MaxBet company.

In the current year, Chisholm Bookmakers Ltd company and MaxBet company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Chisholm Bookmakers Ltd company nor MaxBet company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Chisholm Bookmakers Ltd company nor MaxBet company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Chisholm Bookmakers Ltd company nor MaxBet company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MaxBet company nor Chisholm Bookmakers Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MaxBet nor Chisholm Bookmakers Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither MaxBet company nor Chisholm Bookmakers Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

MaxBet company employs more people globally than Chisholm Bookmakers Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither MaxBet nor Chisholm Bookmakers Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MaxBet nor Chisholm Bookmakers Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MaxBet nor Chisholm Bookmakers Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MaxBet nor Chisholm Bookmakers Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MaxBet nor Chisholm Bookmakers Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MaxBet nor Chisholm Bookmakers Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H