Comparison Overview

Max Foster Photography

VS

Interfit Photographic

Max Foster Photography

undefined, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55446, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.maxfosterphotography.com/

Max Foster is an international award-winning landscape and nature photographer from Minneapolis, Minnesota whose work has been featured in top publications such as National Geographic, Outdoor Photographer, and Practical Photography. Max specializes in creating large format, limited edition, gallery quality fine art prints and has had the privilege of working with clients worldwide since 2014. All Max Foster Photography limited edition prints are made-to-order, numbered, signed, and handcrafted in the USA.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Interfit Photographic

15231 Barranca Parkway, Irvine, CA, 92618, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 700 and 749
http://www.interfitphotographic.com

Interfit Photographic was established in 2001 to develop innovative, high quality, professional lighting products and accessories that enable photo and video artists of all skill levels to expand their creativity and realize consistently meaningful images, at an affordable price. As fellow artists, we believe that investment in the tools of our craft should be based on substance versus flash. In an industry dominated by costly marketing machines where a single monolight could cost you your whole paycheck, Interfit exists to provide a more realistic and supportive answer. Our solution-based lighting products and accessories deliver both uncompromising performance and value, all while giving you the simplest possible workflow. The broad range of our products enables us to meet the needs, and budgets, of both professional and amateur creators. Interfit products are currently distributed throughout North and South America, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. AWARDS: American Photo Editors Choice Award for Best Buy Lighting Product Digital Photo Gold Award (4x) Gear of the Year Award (2x) Digital SLR Highly Rated AP 5 Star Award Bestcovery Award Best Modifier

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/max-foster-photography.jpeg
Max Foster Photography
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/interfitphotographic.jpeg
Interfit Photographic
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Max Foster Photography
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Interfit Photographic
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Max Foster Photography in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Interfit Photographic in 2025.

Incident History — Max Foster Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Max Foster Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Interfit Photographic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Interfit Photographic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/max-foster-photography.jpeg
Max Foster Photography
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/interfitphotographic.jpeg
Interfit Photographic
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Max Foster Photography company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Interfit Photographic company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Interfit Photographic company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Max Foster Photography company.

In the current year, Interfit Photographic company and Max Foster Photography company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Interfit Photographic company nor Max Foster Photography company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Interfit Photographic company nor Max Foster Photography company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Interfit Photographic company nor Max Foster Photography company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Max Foster Photography company nor Interfit Photographic company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Max Foster Photography nor Interfit Photographic holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Max Foster Photography company nor Interfit Photographic company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Max Foster Photography company and Interfit Photographic company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Max Foster Photography nor Interfit Photographic holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Max Foster Photography nor Interfit Photographic holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Max Foster Photography nor Interfit Photographic holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Max Foster Photography nor Interfit Photographic holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Max Foster Photography nor Interfit Photographic holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Max Foster Photography nor Interfit Photographic holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References