Comparison Overview

Matthew Robbins Design

VS

CLI Design

Matthew Robbins Design

None
Last Update: 2025-03-19 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000
http://www.matthewrobbinsdesign.com

Excellent

Event Design, Planning, Production & Interior Design. For events we offer everything from beautiful flowers to lighting, linens and furniture. We also have an amazing collection of vintage objects and props available to our clients. We design events all over the world and also offer interior design services to some of our clients.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CLI Design

undefined, Los Angeles, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-03-20 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000
http://clidesign.com

We are a national lighting design firm based out of California, with offices in New York and Miami. We specialize in lighting design for commercial, hospitality, multi family, retail and restaurant projects. We not only are able to design for the interior, exterior and facade of your project- but we are able to provide direct pricing along the way to solidify the overall budget as well as source and supply.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Matthew Robbins Design
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clidesign.jpeg
CLI Design
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Matthew Robbins Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CLI Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Matthew Robbins Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CLI Design in 2025.

Incident History — Matthew Robbins Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Matthew Robbins Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CLI Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CLI Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Matthew Robbins Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clidesign.jpeg
CLI Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Matthew Robbins Design company and CLI Design company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, CLI Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Matthew Robbins Design company.

In the current year, CLI Design company and Matthew Robbins Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CLI Design company nor Matthew Robbins Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CLI Design company nor Matthew Robbins Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CLI Design company nor Matthew Robbins Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Matthew Robbins Design company nor CLI Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

CLI Design company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Matthew Robbins Design company.

Matthew Robbins Design company employs more people globally than CLI Design company, reflecting its scale as a Design.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
References
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
References