Comparison Overview

Matrix CNI

VS

Design One

Matrix CNI

Suite 1.03, Level 1, 13-15 Lyon Park Road, Macquarie Park, 2113, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Matrix CNI is an Australian owned specialist network integrator with expertise in the fields of converged data centre infrastructure, campus LANs, Unified Communications, wireless mobility, and security. We maintain strategic relationships with a select group of key industry vendors to provide our customers with competitive, reliable and secure solutions with best of breed features and performance. Our clients include a wide range of education, health, government and enterprise organisations. Key to our success has been our culture of providing sound solution advice, being swift and responsive to any client requests, and our solid track record in delivering products, services, and integrated solutions large or small in a thorough, predictable, and timely manner.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Design One

451 Hungerford Dr., Rockville, MD, 20850, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Design One is a full service computer network solutions company providing secure Local Area Networks and Wide Area Networks, maintenance, tech support, and preventive services to the legal and business communities. We strive to find the best solution for each client at the most affordable price. Our senior staff has been with Design One for an average of 15 years, and we have more than 100 years of combined technical experience. We were one of the first companies in Washington, DC to offer computer networking services, and we’re still at it today.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/matrixcni.jpeg
Matrix CNI
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/design-one_3.jpeg
Design One
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Matrix CNI
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Design One
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Matrix CNI in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Design One in 2025.

Incident History — Matrix CNI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Matrix CNI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Design One (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Design One cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/matrixcni.jpeg
Matrix CNI
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/design-one_3.jpeg
Design One
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Design One company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Matrix CNI company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Design One company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Matrix CNI company.

In the current year, Design One company and Matrix CNI company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Design One company nor Matrix CNI company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Design One company nor Matrix CNI company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Design One company nor Matrix CNI company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Matrix CNI company nor Design One company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Matrix CNI nor Design One holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Matrix CNI company nor Design One company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Matrix CNI company employs more people globally than Design One company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Matrix CNI nor Design One holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Matrix CNI nor Design One holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Matrix CNI nor Design One holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Matrix CNI nor Design One holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Matrix CNI nor Design One holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Matrix CNI nor Design One holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.