Comparison Overview

Matrix Print & Design

VS

Jaggerprint

Matrix Print & Design

33 Queen Street, Barnstaple, Devon, EX32 8HG, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Matrix Print and Design are unique printers based in Barnstaple, North Devon offering the widest range of design and printing services in the south west. Set up in 1982 as a Prontaprint Barnstaple franchise the business was purchased by Managing Director Steve Evans in 1998. From a standard Photocopying shop the business has grown into a forward thinking dynamic Design and Printing operation offering the most up to date printing services. Our primary goal is customer satisfaction and many of our clients have been with us for the last 30 years because as their businesses have changed, so have we. In 2011 we overhauled our branding, dispatching the Prontaprint Barnstaple franchise and became Matrix Print & Design. In 2012 new larger premises were purchased to cope with an increase in business and a wider range of printing services. In 2013 our exciting new Price Guide including samples was launched, copies of which are available on request. In 2015 we expanded our range to include Banners which can be found at www.matrixbanners.com. Other than Steve the other members of staff have been part of the business for between 8 and 22 years. These include Liam who looks after Production and Sales, David is in charge of Graphic Design, Marianne is the Press Operator and Donna who looks after the marketing of the business.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jaggerprint

None
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Jaggerprint has been trading in Kingston upon Thames, Surrey since 1947. For over 60 years we have been providing a high quality and extensive service from design through to delivered product. Our customers range from large corporate companies and local councils to the individual passing our door and we are happy to produce any job, big or small. We are proud of our work and excel at what we do. We provide a huge range of high quality print services with fast turnaround at affordable prices. The type of print we produce is mostly business stationery and colour brochure work. We operate five printing presses. They are all Heidelberg machines which produce good quality work and are reliable. To complement the offset printing we run a multi-functional monotone copier, a colour copier and a large format SRA3 Canon digital colour press. This enables us to meet the increasing demand for much smaller quantities of colour work. Wide format poster printing (up to A1 size) is also undertaken on site. We are not just printers. We listen to our customers and help them to make decisions and at the same time, working within their budgets. With 20 personnel at Jaggerprint we have a vast wealth of knowledge and a staggering 424 combined years of printing experience! We also have a team of young designers who are continually creating new and fresh ideas.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/matrix-print-&-design.jpeg
Matrix Print & Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jaggerprint.jpeg
Jaggerprint
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Matrix Print & Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jaggerprint
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Matrix Print & Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jaggerprint in 2025.

Incident History — Matrix Print & Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Matrix Print & Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jaggerprint (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jaggerprint cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/matrix-print-&-design.jpeg
Matrix Print & Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jaggerprint.jpeg
Jaggerprint
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Jaggerprint company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Matrix Print & Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Jaggerprint company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Matrix Print & Design company.

In the current year, Jaggerprint company and Matrix Print & Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jaggerprint company nor Matrix Print & Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jaggerprint company nor Matrix Print & Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jaggerprint company nor Matrix Print & Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Matrix Print & Design company nor Jaggerprint company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Matrix Print & Design nor Jaggerprint holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Matrix Print & Design company nor Jaggerprint company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Matrix Print & Design company employs more people globally than Jaggerprint company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Matrix Print & Design nor Jaggerprint holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Matrix Print & Design nor Jaggerprint holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Matrix Print & Design nor Jaggerprint holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Matrix Print & Design nor Jaggerprint holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Matrix Print & Design nor Jaggerprint holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Matrix Print & Design nor Jaggerprint holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L