Comparison Overview

Masur Museum Of Art

VS

National Museum of Racing and Hall of Fame

Masur Museum Of Art

1400 S Grand St, Monroe, Louisiana 71202-2012, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The Masur Museum Of Art is a fine art museum located at 1400 S Grand St, Monroe, Louisiana, United States. The Masur exists through a partnership between the City of Monroe and the Twin City Art Foundation. The mission of the Masur Museum of Art is to provide a quality visual arts experience through temporary exhibitions, educational activities and programs, and collections management, for the citizens of Monroe and the community of Northeast Louisiana. As the largest visual arts museum in Northeast Louisiana, the Masur Museum of Art strives to support and foster visual arts in the cultural and educational life of the community.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

National Museum of Racing and Hall of Fame

191 Union Avenue, Saratoga Springs, 12866, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Admission to the National Museum of Racing and Hall of Fame is always a winning ticket. Interactive programs, the Horse Play! Children's Gallery, rare memorabilia, a fine equine art collection, a behind-the-scenes tour of Saratoga's "Oklahoma" training track, and more tell the colorful story of three centuries of Thoroughbred racing.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/masur-museum-of-art.jpeg
Masur Museum Of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-museum-of-racing-and-hall-of-fame.jpeg
National Museum of Racing and Hall of Fame
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Masur Museum Of Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
National Museum of Racing and Hall of Fame
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Masur Museum Of Art in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Museum of Racing and Hall of Fame in 2026.

Incident History — Masur Museum Of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Masur Museum Of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — National Museum of Racing and Hall of Fame (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Museum of Racing and Hall of Fame cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/masur-museum-of-art.jpeg
Masur Museum Of Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-museum-of-racing-and-hall-of-fame.jpeg
National Museum of Racing and Hall of Fame
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Masur Museum Of Art company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to National Museum of Racing and Hall of Fame company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, National Museum of Racing and Hall of Fame company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Masur Museum Of Art company.

In the current year, National Museum of Racing and Hall of Fame company and Masur Museum Of Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither National Museum of Racing and Hall of Fame company nor Masur Museum Of Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither National Museum of Racing and Hall of Fame company nor Masur Museum Of Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither National Museum of Racing and Hall of Fame company nor Masur Museum Of Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Masur Museum Of Art company nor National Museum of Racing and Hall of Fame company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Masur Museum Of Art nor National Museum of Racing and Hall of Fame holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Masur Museum Of Art company nor National Museum of Racing and Hall of Fame company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

National Museum of Racing and Hall of Fame company employs more people globally than Masur Museum Of Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Masur Museum Of Art nor National Museum of Racing and Hall of Fame holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Masur Museum Of Art nor National Museum of Racing and Hall of Fame holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Masur Museum Of Art nor National Museum of Racing and Hall of Fame holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Masur Museum Of Art nor National Museum of Racing and Hall of Fame holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Masur Museum Of Art nor National Museum of Racing and Hall of Fame holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Masur Museum Of Art nor National Museum of Racing and Hall of Fame holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H