Comparison Overview

MasterTag

VS

Tri-Flex Label

MasterTag

9751 US-31, Montague, Michigan, 49437, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

For three generations, MasterTag has served the horticulture industry exclusively since 1949, when Lou Schmidt designed the first plastic horticultural tag for greenhouse growers. Now we're helping a new generation of horticulture customers with labeling and merchandising products that respond to the challenges of today's industry. The MasterTag promise is a continual focus on improving quality in the marketplace, the workplace, the environment and the community. We adhere to the highest ethical standards, knowing that the quality of our products and the dedication of our employees build trust and strengthen relationships. We will serve our customers through innovation, superb service and a commitment to assisting them in growing their business and our mutual profitability. We treat each other with dignity, fairness and respect. We will foster an inclusive environment that encourages all employees to develop and perform to their fullest potential. MasterTag will be a place where everyone’s ideas and contributions are valued, and where responsibility and accountability are encouraged and rewarded. We will continue to conduct our business in ways that protect and preserve the environment. We will integrate principles of sustainability into our business decisions, processes and products. We will seek to improve the quality of life through locally relevant initiatives in our community.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 122
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tri-Flex Label

48 Allen Blvd, Farmingdale, New York, US, 11735
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

For over 30years, Tri-Flex Label has been serving businesses across the nation: allowing them to rise above their competition with high-quality custom labels at affordable prices. We have been family owned and operated since day one which is why it is so natural for us to treat each and every customer with genuine care, honesty & respect. Adding to our growing family everyday, Tri-Flex Label prides itself on putting the customer first and bringing only the best to the table. Our manufacturing facility, conveniently located in Farmingdale, Long Island, houses state of the art production equipment; turning out some of the incredible labels you see on store shelves all across the nation. We stand by our policy of going to all extremes to meet our customers’ needs by building strong relationships, providing fast turnaround times and assisting our customers through all aspects of the order process.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mastertag.jpeg
MasterTag
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tri-flex-label.jpeg
Tri-Flex Label
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MasterTag
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tri-Flex Label
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MasterTag in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tri-Flex Label in 2025.

Incident History — MasterTag (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MasterTag cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tri-Flex Label (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tri-Flex Label cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mastertag.jpeg
MasterTag
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tri-flex-label.jpeg
Tri-Flex Label
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

MasterTag company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tri-Flex Label company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tri-Flex Label company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MasterTag company.

In the current year, Tri-Flex Label company and MasterTag company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tri-Flex Label company nor MasterTag company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tri-Flex Label company nor MasterTag company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tri-Flex Label company nor MasterTag company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MasterTag company nor Tri-Flex Label company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MasterTag nor Tri-Flex Label holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither MasterTag company nor Tri-Flex Label company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

MasterTag company employs more people globally than Tri-Flex Label company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither MasterTag nor Tri-Flex Label holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MasterTag nor Tri-Flex Label holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MasterTag nor Tri-Flex Label holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MasterTag nor Tri-Flex Label holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MasterTag nor Tri-Flex Label holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MasterTag nor Tri-Flex Label holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L