Comparison Overview

Masterpack

VS

Brandmark, Inc

Masterpack

86 Whitworth Road, Heriotdale, Johannesburg, Gauteng, ZA, 2094
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Specialists in Folding Cartons and Package Inserts for the Healthcare (Pharmaceutical & Nutriceutical), Personal Care and Confectionery Food sectors. Our success is measured by that of our customers, to that end, we make it our business to assist them gain the competitive edge in their markets. Born and grown as a family business and now a proudly Level 3 BBBEE certified Bidvest company, we have used the close to 40 years serving this sector to hone the skills of understanding each of our customers unique requirements. Once understood and confident we can add value, our focus is to align to these with the aim of delivering product and service that will assist them achieve their vision and make them leaders in their respective fields. We are proud to have become long term partners with some of the best known companies. Appropriate compliance standards to meet the requirements of the sectors we serve are entrenched. This includes ISO 22000 We are the African representative for the Global packaging alliance (www.global-packaging-alliance.com), an alliance of strategically placed folding carton companies around the globe. This is a hub for the sharing of all intelligence related to the supply of cartons and the market internationally. It is a boost for our innovative DNA and we are proud to have delivered many trend setting innovations to the industry. We continue to do this through our Innov8 forum. Sustainability is a priority and we are able to provide packaging solutions that have after life features of being Bio Degradable, Recyclable and most importantly Compostable. Our FSC® C031324 certification is an additional indication of our commitment. In memory of Tom McLaughlin ex packaging manager at Woolworths these words of his remain an inspiration to us ....."If I had not visited Masterpack, I would never have known such a gem existed" If you like smart packaging, chances are good that you will open one of our cartons this week.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 138
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Brandmark, Inc

506 Fair St, Anderson, South Carolina, US, 29625
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Brandmark, a Wise company, is a label and tag manufacturer providing the best solutions to your label and tag challenges. We will utilize our extensive portfolio of raw materials and manufacturing capabilities to create products the exceed expectations. Brandmark strives to be your leading partner by providing superior products with exceptional customer service. Our team is standing by to help you find the right solution for your application.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/masterpack.jpeg
Masterpack
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brandmark-inc-.jpeg
Brandmark, Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Masterpack
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Brandmark, Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Masterpack in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brandmark, Inc in 2025.

Incident History — Masterpack (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Masterpack cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Brandmark, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brandmark, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/masterpack.jpeg
Masterpack
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brandmark-inc-.jpeg
Brandmark, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Masterpack company and Brandmark, Inc company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Brandmark, Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Masterpack company.

In the current year, Brandmark, Inc company and Masterpack company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Brandmark, Inc company nor Masterpack company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Brandmark, Inc company nor Masterpack company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Brandmark, Inc company nor Masterpack company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Masterpack company nor Brandmark, Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Masterpack nor Brandmark, Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Masterpack company nor Brandmark, Inc company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Masterpack company employs more people globally than Brandmark, Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Masterpack nor Brandmark, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Masterpack nor Brandmark, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Masterpack nor Brandmark, Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Masterpack nor Brandmark, Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Masterpack nor Brandmark, Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Masterpack nor Brandmark, Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N