Comparison Overview

Mastercard

VS

inDrive

Mastercard

2000 Purchase St, Purchase, NY, US, 10577
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.mastercard.com

Mastercard powers economies and empowers people in 200+ countries and territories worldwide. Together with our customers, we’re building a sustainable economy where everyone can prosper. We support a wide range of digital payments choices, making transactions secure, simple, smart and accessible. Our technology and innovation, partnerships and networks combine to deliver a unique set of products and services that help people, businesses and governments realize their greatest potential.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 42,954
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2
View Profile

inDrive

Mountain View, 94040, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.inDrive.com

inDrive is a global mobility and urban services platform. The inDrive app has been downloaded over 360 million times, and has been the second most downloaded mobility app for the third consecutive year. In addition to ride-hailing, inDrive provides an expanding list of urban services, including intercity transportation and delivery. In 2023, inDrive launched New Ventures, a venture and M&A arm. inDrive operates in 982 cities in 48 countries. Driven by its mission of challenging social injustice, the company is committed to having a positive impact on the lives of one billion people by 2030. It pursues this goal both through its core business, which supports local communities via a fair pricing model; and through the work of inVision, its non-profit arm. inVision’s community empowerment programs help to advance education, sports, arts and sciences, gender equality and other vital initiatives. For more information visit www.inDrive.com

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 10,185
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mastercard.jpeg
Mastercard
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indrive.jpeg
inDrive
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mastercard
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
inDrive
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mastercard in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for inDrive in 2025.

Incident History — Mastercard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mastercard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — inDrive (X = Date, Y = Severity)

inDrive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mastercard.jpeg
Mastercard
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2021
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: malware, ransomware, social engineering
Motivation: Information Extraction
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2019
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indrive.jpeg
inDrive
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mastercard company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to inDrive company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Mastercard company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas inDrive company has not reported any.

In the current year, inDrive company and Mastercard company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Mastercard company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while inDrive company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither inDrive company nor Mastercard company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither inDrive company nor Mastercard company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mastercard company nor inDrive company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mastercard nor inDrive holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Mastercard company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to inDrive company.

Mastercard company employs more people globally than inDrive company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Mastercard nor inDrive holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mastercard nor inDrive holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mastercard nor inDrive holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mastercard nor inDrive holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mastercard nor inDrive holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mastercard nor inDrive holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References