Comparison Overview

Mastercard

VS

Hexaware Technologies

Mastercard

2000 Purchase St, Purchase, NY, US, 10577
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 800 and 849

Mastercard powers economies and empowers people in 200+ countries and territories worldwide. Together with our customers, we’re building a sustainable economy where everyone can prosper. We support a wide range of digital payments choices, making transactions secure, simple, smart and accessible. Our technology and innovation, partnerships and networks combine to deliver a unique set of products and services that help people, businesses and governments realize their greatest potential.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 42,954
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Hexaware Technologies

#1, Sector III, Millennium Business Park,, 'A'​ Block , TTC Industrial Estate, Mahape,, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400710
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

At Hexaware, we're not just a global technology and business process services company; we're a community of 31,600+ Hexawarians dedicated to one singular purpose: creating smiles through the power of great people and technology. With a presence in 58 offices across 28 countries, we empower enterprises worldwide to embark on their digital transformation journey with unparalleled scale and speed. As an employer, we're more than just a workplace. We put our people first, foster diversity and inclusivity, and prioritize their growth through robust learning and development programs. Our culture is a canvas for innovation as we work toward our shared vision of becoming the world’s most loved digital transformation partner. Exciting, isn’t it? Visit www.hexaware.com to join us in embracing the magic of technology, as we passionately advocate for its potential to transform lives today and shape a brighter future. Together, we'll make the digital world a better place.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 33,909
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mastercard.jpeg
Mastercard
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hexaware-technologies.jpeg
Hexaware Technologies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mastercard
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hexaware Technologies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mastercard in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hexaware Technologies in 2025.

Incident History — Mastercard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mastercard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hexaware Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hexaware Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mastercard.jpeg
Mastercard
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2021
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: malware, ransomware, social engineering
Motivation: Information Extraction
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2019
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hexaware-technologies.jpeg
Hexaware Technologies
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mastercard company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hexaware Technologies company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Mastercard company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Hexaware Technologies company has not reported any.

In the current year, Hexaware Technologies company and Mastercard company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Mastercard company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Hexaware Technologies company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Hexaware Technologies company nor Mastercard company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hexaware Technologies company nor Mastercard company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mastercard company nor Hexaware Technologies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mastercard nor Hexaware Technologies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Mastercard company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Hexaware Technologies company.

Mastercard company employs more people globally than Hexaware Technologies company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Mastercard nor Hexaware Technologies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mastercard nor Hexaware Technologies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mastercard nor Hexaware Technologies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mastercard nor Hexaware Technologies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mastercard nor Hexaware Technologies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mastercard nor Hexaware Technologies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H