Comparison Overview

MassMutual

VS

Deutsche Bank

MassMutual

1295 State Street, None, Springfield, Massachusetts, US, 01111
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 600 and 649

Living mutual has always been at the core of our human existence, and it's the principle that's guided us since our founding in 1851. It's not a concept we invented, but one we champion for the simple reason that people take it for granted today. While the world would have us strive for independence, the truth is when we depend on one another, we aren't just more secure - life is happier and more fulfilling. So as we celebrate our new identity, we're reminding everyone that who we are stays the same. Learn more at: www.MassMutual.com Disclosures about MassMutual’s LinkedIn Company Page and other social media sites are located at: https://www.massmutual.com/social-media-guidelines. CRN201905-212768

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 12,846
Subsidiaries: 61
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
10
Attack type number
1

Deutsche Bank

Taunusanlage 12, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, 60325, DE
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 700 and 749

Deutsche Bank is the leading German bank with strong European roots and a global network. The bank focuses on its strengths in a Corporate Bank newly created in 2019, a leading Private Bank, a focused investment bank and in asset management. We provide financial services to companies, governments, institutional investors, small and medium-sized businesses and private individuals. Deutsche Bank was founded in 1870 to accompany German businesses into the world, and has worked across borders ever since. Useful links: Jobs https://www.db.com/careers. Netiquette at https://www.db.com/netiquette. Data protection policy https://www.db.com/DataProtection. Imprint https://www.db.com/imprint.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 74,237
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/massmutual-financial-group.jpeg
MassMutual
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deutsche-bank.jpeg
Deutsche Bank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MassMutual
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Deutsche Bank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MassMutual in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Deutsche Bank in 2025.

Incident History — MassMutual (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MassMutual cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Deutsche Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deutsche Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/massmutual-financial-group.jpeg
MassMutual
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Zero-day vulnerability exploitation
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deutsche-bank.jpeg
Deutsche Bank
Incidents

Date Detected: 07/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Software Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Access, Logical Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Initial Access Broker
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Deutsche Bank company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MassMutual company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

MassMutual company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Deutsche Bank company.

In the current year, Deutsche Bank company and MassMutual company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Deutsche Bank company nor MassMutual company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Deutsche Bank company and MassMutual company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Deutsche Bank company nor MassMutual company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MassMutual company nor Deutsche Bank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MassMutual nor Deutsche Bank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

MassMutual company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Deutsche Bank company.

Deutsche Bank company employs more people globally than MassMutual company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither MassMutual nor Deutsche Bank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MassMutual nor Deutsche Bank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MassMutual nor Deutsche Bank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MassMutual nor Deutsche Bank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MassMutual nor Deutsche Bank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MassMutual nor Deutsche Bank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H