Comparison Overview

Massiv Die-Form

VS

Danfoss

Massiv Die-Form

None
Last Update: 2026-03-09
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.magna.com/

Massiv Die Form Designs and builds medium to large cast stamping dies, Hot Stamping, hydroform dies, HPDC Dies, and related equipment. Processes include machining, assembly, tryout, robotics, Metrology, Laser cutting etc. Capabilities include die design, pattern construction and casting of associated cast iron and cast steel die components. Massiv Die-Form Has a world Class Training center Sponsoring and Graduating an average of 10 tool and Die Apprentices each year.

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 158
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Danfoss

Nordborgvej 81, Nordborg, DK, 6430
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.danfoss.com

Danfoss engineers solutions that increase machine productivity, reduce emissions, lower energy consumption, and enable electrification. Our solutions are used in such areas as refrigeration, air conditioning, heating, power conversion, motor control, industrial machinery, automotive, marine, and off- and on-highway equipment. We also provide solutions for renewable energy, such as solar and wind power, as well as district-energy infrastructure for cities. Our innovative engineering dates back to 1933. Danfoss is family-owned, employing more than 39,000 people, serving customers in more than 100 countries through a global footprint of 100 factories. Follow us on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook: www.instagram.com/danfoss_group www.twitter.com/Danfoss www.facebook.com/Danfoss

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 22,778
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/massiv-die-form.jpeg
Massiv Die-Form
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/danfoss.jpeg
Danfoss
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Massiv Die-Form
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Danfoss
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Massiv Die-Form in 2026.

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Danfoss has 58.33% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Massiv Die-Form (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Massiv Die-Form cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Danfoss (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Danfoss cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/massiv-die-form.jpeg
Massiv Die-Form
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/danfoss.jpeg
Danfoss
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2026
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Danfoss company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Massiv Die-Form company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Danfoss company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Massiv Die-Form company has not reported any.

In the current year, Danfoss company has reported more cyber incidents than Massiv Die-Form company.

Neither Danfoss company nor Massiv Die-Form company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Danfoss company nor Massiv Die-Form company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Danfoss company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Massiv Die-Form company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Massiv Die-Form company nor Danfoss company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Massiv Die-Form nor Danfoss holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Danfoss company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Massiv Die-Form company.

Danfoss company employs more people globally than Massiv Die-Form company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Machinery Manufacturing.

Neither Massiv Die-Form nor Danfoss holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Massiv Die-Form nor Danfoss holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Massiv Die-Form nor Danfoss holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Massiv Die-Form nor Danfoss holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Massiv Die-Form nor Danfoss holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Massiv Die-Form nor Danfoss holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References