Comparison Overview

Massachusetts Charter Public School Association

VS

Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission

Massachusetts Charter Public School Association

43 Broad Street, Suite C-401, Hudson, MA, 01749, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Massachusetts Charter Public School Association (MCPSA) is a school membership organization that is committed to ensuring that all children and families across the Commonwealth have access to high-quality public schools. As the voice of one of the nation’s highest-performing charter public school sectors, MCPSA engages in public policy advocacy, communications, and best practice sharing and training aimed at strengthening educational programming. MCPSA’s mission is to create and protect the conditions that will enable the charter public school sector to thrive, and advance the larger goal of ensuring all Massachusetts children and families have equitable access to high-quality schools. To achieve our mission, MCPSA advocates for public policy that supports equitable educational opportunities and supports member schools across Massachusetts; provides best practice sharing and professional development for leaders, educators, and board members to support strong educational practices, governance, and advocacy engagement; and amplifies the stories and voices of the charter public school community. Since its inception, the K-12 public education system has been utilized as a tool to advance and protect systemic racism. From withholding education from enslaved peoples, to separate and unequal segregated schools, to the use of local property taxes and manipulated municipal boundaries as the basis for public education funding, systemic racism has and continues to impact children’s K-12 educational opportunities. MCPSA will work to build a more just and equitable K-12 public education system in Massachusetts — in short, one in which every child receives a high-quality public education that enables them to thrive and to reach their full potential.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission

GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission is a new organisation established by the Child Maintenance and Other Payments Act 2008, following an in-depth review of child maintenance policy and delivery arrangements in this country. The Commission is responsible for the child maintenance system in Great Britain. The Commission’s key objective is to maximise the number of effective child maintenance arrangements that are in place, whether private or statutory. To achieve this aim, the Commission provides an information and support service (Child Maintenance Options) and oversees the statutory maintenance service currently run by the Child Support Agency. Over time, the Commission will improve arrangements for the assessment, collection and enforcement of child maintenance for parents using that service. The Commission is a crown Non-Departmental Public Body, which means it operates at arms length from Government, enabling it to innovate and provide services how and through the mechanisms it chooses. With this new structure, we have an opportunity to deliver a new system of child maintenance in Great Britain that really works for separated families.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 110
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/massachusetts-charter-public-school-association.jpeg
Massachusetts Charter Public School Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Massachusetts Charter Public School Association
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Massachusetts Charter Public School Association in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission in 2025.

Incident History — Massachusetts Charter Public School Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Massachusetts Charter Public School Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/massachusetts-charter-public-school-association.jpeg
Massachusetts Charter Public School Association
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Massachusetts Charter Public School Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Massachusetts Charter Public School Association company.

In the current year, Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company and Massachusetts Charter Public School Association company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company nor Massachusetts Charter Public School Association company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company nor Massachusetts Charter Public School Association company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company nor Massachusetts Charter Public School Association company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Massachusetts Charter Public School Association company nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Massachusetts Charter Public School Association nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Massachusetts Charter Public School Association company nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company employs more people globally than Massachusetts Charter Public School Association company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Massachusetts Charter Public School Association nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Massachusetts Charter Public School Association nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Massachusetts Charter Public School Association nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Massachusetts Charter Public School Association nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Massachusetts Charter Public School Association nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Massachusetts Charter Public School Association nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H