Comparison Overview

Massachusetts Attorney General's Office

VS

Lane Neave

Massachusetts Attorney General's Office

One Ashburton Place, Boston, 02108-1518, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Attorney General is the chief lawyer and law enforcement officer of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. In addition, her office is an advocate and resource for the people of Massachusetts in many ways, including protecting consumers, combating fraud and corruption, investigating and prosecuting crime, and protecting the environment, workers, and civil rights. The Office of the Attorney General is organized into six Bureaus: Executive; Criminal; Energy and Environment; Government; Health Care and Fair Competition and Public Protection and Advocacy. Each bureau is divided into divisions and teams. These Bureaus and Divisions have distinct missions, but work closely together to ensure the Attorney General’s Office provides the highest level of public protection.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 614
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lane Neave

141 Cambridge Terrace, Christchurch, Canterbury, NZ, 8013
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

At Lane Neave we thrive on making complex issues simple for our clients. We do that by providing plain English advice that doesn’t sit on the fence. Recognised nationally as one of New Zealand’s leading law firms, Lane Neave is a full-service law firm located in Auckland, Wellington, Christchurch and Queenstown with a local and global client base. The diverse and eclectic nature of our legal minds means that we have the depth of knowledge and experience required for any job. It’s also what makes our thinking innovative and gives our clients an edge. Our entrepreneurial thinking means we design and tailor our legal teams around your requirements. Together we can tackle anything.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 147
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/massachusetts-attorney-general's-office.jpeg
Massachusetts Attorney General's Office
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lane-neave.jpeg
Lane Neave
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Massachusetts Attorney General's Office
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lane Neave
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Massachusetts Attorney General's Office in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lane Neave in 2025.

Incident History — Massachusetts Attorney General's Office (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Massachusetts Attorney General's Office cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lane Neave (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lane Neave cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/massachusetts-attorney-general's-office.jpeg
Massachusetts Attorney General's Office
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lane-neave.jpeg
Lane Neave
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Massachusetts Attorney General's Office company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lane Neave company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lane Neave company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Massachusetts Attorney General's Office company.

In the current year, Lane Neave company and Massachusetts Attorney General's Office company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lane Neave company nor Massachusetts Attorney General's Office company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lane Neave company nor Massachusetts Attorney General's Office company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lane Neave company nor Massachusetts Attorney General's Office company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Massachusetts Attorney General's Office company nor Lane Neave company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Massachusetts Attorney General's Office nor Lane Neave holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Massachusetts Attorney General's Office company nor Lane Neave company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Massachusetts Attorney General's Office company employs more people globally than Lane Neave company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Massachusetts Attorney General's Office nor Lane Neave holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Massachusetts Attorney General's Office nor Lane Neave holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Massachusetts Attorney General's Office nor Lane Neave holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Massachusetts Attorney General's Office nor Lane Neave holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Massachusetts Attorney General's Office nor Lane Neave holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Massachusetts Attorney General's Office nor Lane Neave holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X