Comparison Overview

Massachusetts Advocates for Children

VS

Mountain State Justice

Massachusetts Advocates for Children

25 Kingston Street, 2nd Floor, Boston, Massachusetts, 02111, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Massachusetts Advocates for Children is a private nonprofit organization dedicated to being an independent and effective voice for children who face significant barriers to equal educational and life opportunities. MAC works to overcome these barriers by changing conditions for many children, while also helping one child at a time. For over 50 years, MAC has responded to the needs of children who are vulnerable because of poverty, race, limited English or disability.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mountain State Justice

1217 Quarrier St, Charleston, West Virginia, 25301, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Mountain State Justice is a non-profit legal services firm dedicated to redressing entrenched and emerging systemic social, political, and economic imbalances of power for underserved West Virginians, through legal advocacy and community empowerment offered regardless of ability to pay. Essential to this mission is an inclusive work environment that encourages, supports, and rewards the collaborative and creative pursuit of professional excellence.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/massachusetts-advocates-for-children.jpeg
Massachusetts Advocates for Children
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mountain-state-justice-inc.jpeg
Mountain State Justice
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Massachusetts Advocates for Children
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mountain State Justice
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Massachusetts Advocates for Children in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mountain State Justice in 2025.

Incident History — Massachusetts Advocates for Children (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Massachusetts Advocates for Children cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mountain State Justice (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mountain State Justice cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/massachusetts-advocates-for-children.jpeg
Massachusetts Advocates for Children
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mountain-state-justice-inc.jpeg
Mountain State Justice
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mountain State Justice company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Massachusetts Advocates for Children company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mountain State Justice company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Massachusetts Advocates for Children company.

In the current year, Mountain State Justice company and Massachusetts Advocates for Children company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mountain State Justice company nor Massachusetts Advocates for Children company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mountain State Justice company nor Massachusetts Advocates for Children company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mountain State Justice company nor Massachusetts Advocates for Children company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Massachusetts Advocates for Children company nor Mountain State Justice company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Massachusetts Advocates for Children nor Mountain State Justice holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Massachusetts Advocates for Children company nor Mountain State Justice company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Massachusetts Advocates for Children company employs more people globally than Mountain State Justice company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Massachusetts Advocates for Children nor Mountain State Justice holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Massachusetts Advocates for Children nor Mountain State Justice holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Massachusetts Advocates for Children nor Mountain State Justice holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Massachusetts Advocates for Children nor Mountain State Justice holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Massachusetts Advocates for Children nor Mountain State Justice holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Massachusetts Advocates for Children nor Mountain State Justice holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X