Comparison Overview

Mass General Brigham

VS

Providence

Mass General Brigham

399 Revolution Dr, None, Somerville, Massachusetts, US, 02145
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Mass General Brigham is an integrated academic health care system, uniting great minds to solve the hardest problems in medicine for our communities and the world. Mass General Brigham connects a full continuum of care across a system of academic medical centers, community and specialty hospitals, a health insurance plan, physician networks, community health centers, home care, and long-term care services. Mass General Brigham is a nonprofit organization that is committed to patient care, research, teaching, and service to the community. In addition, Mass General Brigham is one of the nation’s leading biomedical research organizations and a principal teaching affiliate of Harvard Medical School.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 11,655
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Providence

US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 700 and 749

Every day, 119,000 compassionate caregivers serve patients and communities through Providence St. Joseph Health, a national, Catholic, not-for-profit health system, driven by a belief that health is a human right. Rooted in the founding missions of the Sisters of Providence and the Sisters of St. Joseph of Orange, courageous women ahead of their time who brought health care and other social services to the American West when it was still a rugged, untamed frontier, we share a singular commitment to improve the health of all. From our earliest days, we’ve met new challenges by pioneering new solutions. Today, with 51 hospitals, 829 clinics and a comprehensive range of services, we strive to meet the needs of communities across Alaska, California, Montana, New Mexico, Oregon, Texas and Washington through a diverse family of Catholic, other faith-based and mission-driven secular organizations. Now, as we face a new frontier—a changing health care landscape—we draw upon their pioneering and compassionate spirit to plan for the next century of health for a better world, especially for the poor and vulnerable. If you need treatment, please visit www.providence.org to locate a health care provider.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 49,284
Subsidiaries: 30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mass-general-brigham.jpeg
Mass General Brigham
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/providencehealthsystem.jpeg
Providence
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mass General Brigham
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Providence
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mass General Brigham in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Providence in 2025.

Incident History — Mass General Brigham (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mass General Brigham cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Providence (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Providence cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mass-general-brigham.jpeg
Mass General Brigham
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Human Error
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/providencehealthsystem.jpeg
Providence
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Unauthorized data access and system encryption
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 02/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Providence company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mass General Brigham company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Providence company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Mass General Brigham company.

In the current year, Providence company and Mass General Brigham company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Providence company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Mass General Brigham company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Providence company and Mass General Brigham company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Providence company nor Mass General Brigham company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mass General Brigham company nor Providence company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mass General Brigham nor Providence holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Providence company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Mass General Brigham company.

Providence company employs more people globally than Mass General Brigham company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Mass General Brigham nor Providence holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mass General Brigham nor Providence holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mass General Brigham nor Providence holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mass General Brigham nor Providence holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mass General Brigham nor Providence holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mass General Brigham nor Providence holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

WeGIA is an open source Web Manager for Institutions with a focus on Portuguese language users. Versions 3.5.4 and below contain a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the /WeGIA/html/geral/configurar_senhas.php endpoint. The application does not sanitize user-controlled data before rendering it inside the employee selection dropdown. The application retrieves employee names from the database and injects them directly into HTML <option> elements without proper escaping. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.0.0-rc.1 through 4.7.0 are vulnerable to DOM-Based XSS through the Zitadel V2 logout endpoint. The /logout endpoint insecurely routes to a value that is supplied in the post_logout_redirect GET parameter. As a result, unauthenticated remote attacker can execute malicious JS code on Zitadel users’ browsers. To carry out an attack, multiple user sessions need to be active in the same browser, however, account takeover is mitigated when using Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) or Passwordless authentication. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.7.0 and below are vulnerable to an unauthenticated, full-read SSRF vulnerability. The ZITADEL Login UI (V2) treats the x-zitadel-forward-host header as a trusted fallback for all deployments, including self-hosted instances. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to force the server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary domains, such as internal addresses, and read the responses, enabling data exfiltration and bypassing network-segmentation controls. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

NiceGUI is a Python-based UI framework. Versions 3.3.1 and below are vulnerable to directory traversal through the App.add_media_files() function, which allows a remote attacker to read arbitrary files on the server filesystem. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions are vulnerable to authentication bypass when the authentication type is set to "webserver." When providing an Authorization header with an arbitrary value, a session is associated with the target user regardless of valid credentials. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.44 and 17.0.23.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X