Comparison Overview

Mass General Brigham

VS

Philips

Mass General Brigham

399 Revolution Dr, Somerville, Massachusetts, US, 02145
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/

Mass General Brigham is an integrated academic health care system, uniting great minds to solve the hardest problems in medicine for our communities and the world. Mass General Brigham connects a full continuum of care across a system of academic medical centers, community and specialty hospitals, a health insurance plan, physician networks, community health centers, home care, and long-term care services. Mass General Brigham is a nonprofit organization that is committed to patient care, research, teaching, and service to the community. In addition, Mass General Brigham is one of the nation’s leading biomedical research organizations and a principal teaching affiliate of Harvard Medical School.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 13,230
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Philips

Amstelplein 2, Amsterdam, 1096 BC, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799
https://www.philips.com/a-w/about.html

Over the past decade we have transformed into a focused leader in health technology. At Philips, our purpose is to improve people’s health and well-being through meaningful innovation. We aim to improve 2.5 billion lives per year by 2030, including 400 million in underserved communities. We see healthcare as a connected whole. Helping people to live healthily and prevent disease. Giving clinicians the tools they need to make a precision diagnosis and deliver personalized treatment. Aiding the patient's recovery at home in the community. All supported by a seamless flow of data. As a technology company, we – and our brand licensees – innovate for people with one consistent belief: there’s always a way to make life better. Visit our website: http://www.philips.com/ Follow our social media house rules https://www.philips.com/a-w/about-philips/social-media.html

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 71,631
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mass-general-brigham.jpeg
Mass General Brigham
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/philips.jpeg
Philips
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mass General Brigham
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Philips
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mass General Brigham in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Philips in 2026.

Incident History — Mass General Brigham (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mass General Brigham cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Philips (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Philips cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mass-general-brigham.jpeg
Mass General Brigham
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Human Error
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/philips.jpeg
Philips
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Philips company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mass General Brigham company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Mass General Brigham company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Philips company.

In the current year, Philips company and Mass General Brigham company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Philips company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Mass General Brigham company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Mass General Brigham company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Philips company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Philips company nor Mass General Brigham company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mass General Brigham company nor Philips company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mass General Brigham nor Philips holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both Philips company and Mass General Brigham company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

Philips company employs more people globally than Mass General Brigham company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Mass General Brigham nor Philips holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mass General Brigham nor Philips holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mass General Brigham nor Philips holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mass General Brigham nor Philips holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mass General Brigham nor Philips holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mass General Brigham nor Philips holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References