Comparison Overview

Mass Appeal Designs

VS

Jerney de Jong

Mass Appeal Designs

Hahnemann House, 42 Hope Street, Liverpool, Mereyside, GB, L1 9HW
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Mass Appeal Designs are a Liverpool based graphic & web design agency specialising in print, branding & digital design services. The majority of our work is for regular clients who outsource all their design projects to us. For over 5 years we have been creating successful logos, websites, packages, adverts & brochures for clients all the way from London to Myanmar. Why do clients continuously use Mass Appeal as their design agency? We go above and beyond to get projects done not only on time and on budget, but with a quality that is in par with the biggest agencies in the world. We do not have huge overheads or a trendy office to pay for, we don't have a hipster office dog, we don't clamour to be nominated for awards. We simply love to work and make our clients happy. We also love zombie movies, comics and 80's movies.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jerney de Jong

Klimopstraat 38 Den Haag, Zuid-Holland 2565 VM, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

I’m passionate about brands and graphic design. To make a brand or product understandable and successful, to make a practical solution that is both functional and beautiful. My approach to a project is driven by creativity and conceptual thinking. I believe that every detail of an visual identity must sum up into one coherent experience. I find working closely with my clients is the best way to create solutions that will last. I work for a diverse range of clients, from individuals to brands, creative agencies and large organisations. More info or just want to say ‘hi’, feel free to contact me!

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mass-appeal-designs.jpeg
Mass Appeal Designs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jerney-de-jong.jpeg
Jerney de Jong
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mass Appeal Designs
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jerney de Jong
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mass Appeal Designs in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jerney de Jong in 2025.

Incident History — Mass Appeal Designs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mass Appeal Designs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jerney de Jong (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jerney de Jong cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mass-appeal-designs.jpeg
Mass Appeal Designs
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jerney-de-jong.jpeg
Jerney de Jong
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Jerney de Jong company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mass Appeal Designs company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Jerney de Jong company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mass Appeal Designs company.

In the current year, Jerney de Jong company and Mass Appeal Designs company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jerney de Jong company nor Mass Appeal Designs company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jerney de Jong company nor Mass Appeal Designs company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jerney de Jong company nor Mass Appeal Designs company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mass Appeal Designs company nor Jerney de Jong company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mass Appeal Designs nor Jerney de Jong holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Mass Appeal Designs company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Jerney de Jong company.

Mass Appeal Designs company employs more people globally than Jerney de Jong company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Mass Appeal Designs nor Jerney de Jong holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mass Appeal Designs nor Jerney de Jong holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mass Appeal Designs nor Jerney de Jong holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mass Appeal Designs nor Jerney de Jong holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mass Appeal Designs nor Jerney de Jong holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mass Appeal Designs nor Jerney de Jong holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X