Comparison Overview

Mase Seitz Briggs

VS

Trajector Disability

Mase Seitz Briggs

2601 South Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida, 33133, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The seasoned attorneys at Mase Seitz Briggs have tried hundreds of civil and criminal cases, jury and non-jury alike. Our legal team focuses its practice on serious personal injury, commercial litigation, maritime, property and white collar criminal defense. We ensure that each client receives the highest level of personal service, professionalism and case preparation while maintaining the highest ethical standards and civility in the practice of law. We believe in what we do. We believe in redressing wrongs. No two clients and no two cases are ever exactly alike. That’s why our method for approaching each case is to consistently provide dedicated service and timely action. Every client receives the benefits of early case evaluation and top-level continuity. Our goal is, and always will be, to provide innovative and constructive resolution of our clients’ legal needs. Please visit our website for more information at www.maselaw.com.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Trajector Disability

758 E. Utah Valley Drive, American Fork, UT, 84003, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

We are Social Security Disability Advocates. We represent clients who are disabled due to physical or mental conditions and are unable to work. We understand how challenging it can be to obtain Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income benefits through the Social Security Administration. Here at Trajector Disability, we do everything we can to "be the difference"​ to our clients as well as our co-workers. With a fun work environment, and an attitude of service, we serve our community and nation's need for help through a difficult process. Our office is located in Utah, but we have attorneys that represent our clients throughout the United States. If you or someone you know needs help with a disability claim, please call us at 800-652-9626.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 204
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mase-lara-eversole-p-a-.jpeg
Mase Seitz Briggs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/myler-disability.jpeg
Trajector Disability
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mase Seitz Briggs
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Trajector Disability
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mase Seitz Briggs in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Trajector Disability in 2025.

Incident History — Mase Seitz Briggs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mase Seitz Briggs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Trajector Disability (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Trajector Disability cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mase-lara-eversole-p-a-.jpeg
Mase Seitz Briggs
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/myler-disability.jpeg
Trajector Disability
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Trajector Disability company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mase Seitz Briggs company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Trajector Disability company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mase Seitz Briggs company.

In the current year, Trajector Disability company and Mase Seitz Briggs company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Trajector Disability company nor Mase Seitz Briggs company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Trajector Disability company nor Mase Seitz Briggs company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Trajector Disability company nor Mase Seitz Briggs company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mase Seitz Briggs company nor Trajector Disability company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mase Seitz Briggs nor Trajector Disability holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Trajector Disability company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Mase Seitz Briggs company.

Trajector Disability company employs more people globally than Mase Seitz Briggs company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Mase Seitz Briggs nor Trajector Disability holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mase Seitz Briggs nor Trajector Disability holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mase Seitz Briggs nor Trajector Disability holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mase Seitz Briggs nor Trajector Disability holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mase Seitz Briggs nor Trajector Disability holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mase Seitz Briggs nor Trajector Disability holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X