Comparison Overview

Maryland Print House

VS

Northern Engraving

Maryland Print House

1100 Business Parkway S, Westminster, 21157, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://marylandprinthouse.com

Maryland Print House was started based on a need for change. The printing industry has been rapidly changing over that last 20 years. The biggest problems most of our customers have involve communication. This could be knowing when their order is finished or simply trying to get an art approval. Maryland Print House embraces technology to help correct these problems that are usually human error. With our shop management technology orders are guaranteed to be delivered on-time, art approval is easy, and orders are never lost. Our amazing staff are able to offer more than just screenprinting and embroidery. We have the ability to help businesses with digital consulting, web development and company branding. At Maryland Print House, we want you to feel at home and confident that the product that you will receive is the perfect fit for your business or event.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Northern Engraving

803 South Black River Street, Sparta, 54656, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.norcorp.com

Nameplates, overlays, decorative trim, appliance panels, and dials. Each of these can be one of the last things considered when designing a product. Yet, each is important to brand recognition and product differentiation. 100 years of connecting brands with decorative solutions has taught us a few things. We know how to take your message to the next level and give you identification that demands a second look. Hundreds of OEM designers trust their brand with us. Collaborate with us on your next project. Let us help create your identity solution.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 199
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marylandprinthouse.jpeg
Maryland Print House
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/northern-engraving.jpeg
Northern Engraving
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Maryland Print House
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Northern Engraving
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Maryland Print House in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Northern Engraving in 2025.

Incident History — Maryland Print House (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Maryland Print House cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Northern Engraving (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Northern Engraving cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marylandprinthouse.jpeg
Maryland Print House
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/northern-engraving.jpeg
Northern Engraving
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Northern Engraving company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Maryland Print House company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Northern Engraving company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Maryland Print House company.

In the current year, Northern Engraving company and Maryland Print House company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Northern Engraving company nor Maryland Print House company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Northern Engraving company nor Maryland Print House company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Northern Engraving company nor Maryland Print House company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Maryland Print House company nor Northern Engraving company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Maryland Print House nor Northern Engraving holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Northern Engraving company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Maryland Print House company.

Northern Engraving company employs more people globally than Maryland Print House company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Maryland Print House nor Northern Engraving holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Maryland Print House nor Northern Engraving holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Maryland Print House nor Northern Engraving holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Maryland Print House nor Northern Engraving holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Maryland Print House nor Northern Engraving holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Maryland Print House nor Northern Engraving holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References