Comparison Overview

Maryland Science Center

VS

Tudor Place Historic House & Garden

Maryland Science Center

601 Light St, Baltimore, MD, US, 21230
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mdsci.org

At the Maryland Science Center, we stand for learning by doing. We are a movement, not confined to four walls. We share our love of science at our home in Baltimore's Inner Harbor, also reaching every corner of Maryland and beyond. Join us as we invite and inspire future generations to celebrate curiosity and to explore our scientific world. We are the Maryland Science Center. Let’s Science.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 119
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Tudor Place Historic House & Garden

1644 31st St NW, None, Washington, District of Columbia, US, 20007
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
https://www.tudorplace.org

A model of Federal-period architecture in the nation’s capital, Tudor Place was home to six generations of Martha Washington’s descendants and the enslaved workers and servants who lived and worked here. With thousands of decorative objects, including the largest Washington Collection outside of Mount Vernon, Tudor Place sits on 5 ½ acres in the heart of Georgetown.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maryland-science-center.jpeg
Maryland Science Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tudor-place-historic-house-and-garden.jpeg
Tudor Place Historic House & Garden
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Maryland Science Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tudor Place Historic House & Garden
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Maryland Science Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tudor Place Historic House & Garden in 2026.

Incident History — Maryland Science Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Maryland Science Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tudor Place Historic House & Garden (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tudor Place Historic House & Garden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maryland-science-center.jpeg
Maryland Science Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tudor-place-historic-house-and-garden.jpeg
Tudor Place Historic House & Garden
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Maryland Science Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tudor Place Historic House & Garden company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tudor Place Historic House & Garden company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Maryland Science Center company.

In the current year, Tudor Place Historic House & Garden company and Maryland Science Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tudor Place Historic House & Garden company nor Maryland Science Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tudor Place Historic House & Garden company nor Maryland Science Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tudor Place Historic House & Garden company nor Maryland Science Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Maryland Science Center company nor Tudor Place Historic House & Garden company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Maryland Science Center nor Tudor Place Historic House & Garden holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Maryland Science Center company nor Tudor Place Historic House & Garden company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Maryland Science Center company employs more people globally than Tudor Place Historic House & Garden company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Maryland Science Center nor Tudor Place Historic House & Garden holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Maryland Science Center nor Tudor Place Historic House & Garden holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Maryland Science Center nor Tudor Place Historic House & Garden holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Maryland Science Center nor Tudor Place Historic House & Garden holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Maryland Science Center nor Tudor Place Historic House & Garden holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Maryland Science Center nor Tudor Place Historic House & Garden holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References