Comparison Overview

Maryland Integrative Counseling Associates

VS

Align Recovery Centers - Sonoma

Maryland Integrative Counseling Associates

7520 Standish Place, Rockville, MD, 20855, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Maryland Integrative Counseling Associates is an outpatient mental health practice specializing in integrating modern effective techniques within the framework of a traditional counseling relationship. All of our therapists are licensed clinicians with training and expertise in a variety of techniques, treatment modalities, and areas of specialization. This allows us to individually tailor treatments while helping a wide array of clientele. We are also one of the largest providers of Neurofeedback in the Mid-Atlantic, with two BCIA-Certified Neurotherapists. Please see our website to learn more on how Neurofeedback can help your therapy be more successful.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Align Recovery Centers - Sonoma

17250 Vailetti Dr, None, Sonoma, California, US, 95476
Last Update: 2026-01-13
Between 700 and 749

A premier Northern California drug and alcohol rehabilitation center that offers premium but affordable services for: Detox, Inpatient residential treatment, and Outpatient programs (intensive and standard) Align Recovery Centers provides innovative, evidence-based programs that enable successful recovery through a holistic approach. This holistic approach includes: group therapy, the community model, individual therapy, cooccuring disorders treatment, a relaxing environment, nutrition, restful sleep, activities to feed the soul and more. Please contact us or stop by to speak with our experienced staff about how we can help!

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maryland-integrative-counseling-associates.jpeg
Maryland Integrative Counseling Associates
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/align-recovery-centers-sonoma.jpeg
Align Recovery Centers - Sonoma
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Maryland Integrative Counseling Associates
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Align Recovery Centers - Sonoma
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Maryland Integrative Counseling Associates in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Align Recovery Centers - Sonoma in 2026.

Incident History — Maryland Integrative Counseling Associates (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Maryland Integrative Counseling Associates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Align Recovery Centers - Sonoma (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Align Recovery Centers - Sonoma cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maryland-integrative-counseling-associates.jpeg
Maryland Integrative Counseling Associates
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/align-recovery-centers-sonoma.jpeg
Align Recovery Centers - Sonoma
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2020
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Maryland Integrative Counseling Associates company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Align Recovery Centers - Sonoma company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Align Recovery Centers - Sonoma company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Maryland Integrative Counseling Associates company has not reported any.

In the current year, Align Recovery Centers - Sonoma company and Maryland Integrative Counseling Associates company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Align Recovery Centers - Sonoma company nor Maryland Integrative Counseling Associates company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Align Recovery Centers - Sonoma company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Maryland Integrative Counseling Associates company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Align Recovery Centers - Sonoma company nor Maryland Integrative Counseling Associates company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Maryland Integrative Counseling Associates company nor Align Recovery Centers - Sonoma company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Maryland Integrative Counseling Associates nor Align Recovery Centers - Sonoma holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Maryland Integrative Counseling Associates company nor Align Recovery Centers - Sonoma company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Maryland Integrative Counseling Associates company employs more people globally than Align Recovery Centers - Sonoma company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Maryland Integrative Counseling Associates nor Align Recovery Centers - Sonoma holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Maryland Integrative Counseling Associates nor Align Recovery Centers - Sonoma holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Maryland Integrative Counseling Associates nor Align Recovery Centers - Sonoma holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Maryland Integrative Counseling Associates nor Align Recovery Centers - Sonoma holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Maryland Integrative Counseling Associates nor Align Recovery Centers - Sonoma holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Maryland Integrative Counseling Associates nor Align Recovery Centers - Sonoma holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N